Quality of conflict management in construction project context: Conceptualization, scale development, and validation

Zhu, F; Wang, L; Yu, M and Yang, X (2020) Quality of conflict management in construction project context: Conceptualization, scale development, and validation. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 27(5), pp. 1191-1211. ISSN 0969-9988

Abstract

Purpose: A growing number of studies have become focused on managing conflict more effectively and comprehensively in the construction industry. However, little research has aimed to operationalize all the facets related to the quality of conflict management that are necessary in governing conflict management. The purpose of this article is to propose a new model measuring the quality of conflict management in a construction project context that is not only inclusive but also practical. Design/methodology/approach: To address this research gap, the authors used the measurement theory to investigate a series of studies, and then, developed a scale to operationalize the concept of quality of conflict management in a project context. Findings: The findings show five dimensions to the quality of conflict management: satisfactory resolution outcome, integrated resolution process, conflict prevention, fairness perception, and post-conflict effect. Originality/value: The research findings contribute to conflict management theory by providing the conceptualization and operationalization of conflict management quality. Practitioners will benefit from this article by understanding effective and efficient ways of managing conflicts in construction projects.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: conceptualization; project context; project performance; quality of conflict management; scale development; validation
Index terms: methodology, construction project, practitioner, validation, conflict management, fairness, project performance, prevention, construction industry, resolution, dimension, scale development
Subjects: health monitoring assessment and metrics, practitioner, leadership, industry analysis, conflict resolution, measurement and scaling, production management, professional development, project management theory and practice, financial risk, research methods
Topics: Organizational Design, Cost Management, Health and Safety, Project Management, Research Practice, Information Management, Stakeholder Management, Roles and Professions
Descriptive scope: 4 PCTA

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here