Arabpour Roghabadi, M and Moselhi, O (2021) Optimized crew selection for scheduling of repetitive projects. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 28(6), pp. 1517-1540. ISSN 0969-9988
Abstract
Purpose: The purpose of this paper is to identify optimum crew formations at unit execution level of repetitive projects that minimize project duration, project cost, crew work interruptions and interruption costs, simultaneously. Design/methodology/approach: The model consists of four modules. The first module quantifies uncertainties associated with the crew productivity rate and quantity of work using the fuzzy set theory. The second module identifies feasible boundaries for activity relaxation. The third module computes direct cost, indirect cost and interruption costs, including idle crew cost as well as mobilization and demobilization costs. The fourth module identifies near-optimum crew formation using a newly developed multi-objective optimization model. Findings: The developed model was able to provide improvements of 0.2, 16.86 and 12.98% for minimization of project cost, crew work interruptions and interruption costs from US$1,505,960, 8.3 days and US$8,300, as recently reported in the literature, to US$1,502,979, 6.9 days and US$7,222, respectively, without impacting the optimized project duration. Originality/value: The novelty of this paper lies in its activity-relaxation free float that considers the effect of postponing early finish dates of repetitive activities on crew work interruptions. The introduced new float allows for calculating the required crew productivity rate that minimizes crew work interruptions without delaying successor activities and without impacting the optimized project duration. It safeguards against assignment of unnecessary costly resources.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | construction; optimization; scheduling |
| Index terms: | duration, multi-objective optimization, successor, module, fuzzy set theory, crew productivity, safeguards, repetitive project, indirect cost, direct cost, boundaries, methodology, project cost, minimization, scheduling |
| Subjects: | property law, operations research, production management, economics, research methods, algorithms, architectural elements, management, cost management, decision-making and optimization, project controls, occupational health and safety management |
| Topics: | Procurement, Health and Safety, Cost Management, Project Management, Research Practice, Site Management, Time Control, Digital Applications, Design Practice, Legal Issues |
| Descriptive scope: | 3 PCT |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here