Charlton, J; Kelly, K; Greenwood, D and Moreton, L (2021) The complexities of managing historic buildings with BIM. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 28(2), pp. 570-583. ISSN 0969-9988
Abstract
Purpose: The adoption of building information modelling (BIM) in managing built heritage is an exciting prospect, but one that presents complexities additional to those of modern buildings. If challenges can be identified and overcome, the adoption of historic BIM (HBIM) could offer efficiencies in how heritage buildings are managed. Design/methodology/approach: Using Durham Cathedral as a case study, we present the workflows applied to create an asset information model to improve the way this unique UNESCO World Heritage Site is managed, and in doing so, set out the challenges and complexities in achieving an HBIM solution. Findings: This study identifies the need for a better understanding of the distinct needs and context for managing historic assets, and the need for heritage information requirements (HIR) that reflect this. Originality/value: This study presents first-hand findings based on a unique application of BIM at Durham Cathedral, a UNESCO World Heritage Site. The study provides a better understanding of the challenges and drivers of HBIM adoption across the heritage sector and underlines the need for information requirements that are unique to historical buildings/assets to deliver a coherent and relevant HBIM approach.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | building information modeling; case study; management; process; technology |
| Index terms: | UNESCO, efficiency, building information modelling, case study, built heritage, workflow, complexity, historical building, methodology, heritage building, historic building |
| Subjects: | institutional frameworks, data collection methods, construction type, information systems, systems engineering, heritage and conservation, research methods, performance management, management |
| Topics: | Design Practice, Digital Applications, Quality Management, Construction Technology, Governance, Business Strategy, Research Practice, Engineering Principles |
| Descriptive scope: | 4 PCTE |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here