Elghaish, F and Abrishami, S (2021) A centralised cost management system: Exploiting EVM and abc within IPD. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 28(2), pp. 549-569. ISSN 0969-9988
Abstract
Purpose: Integrated project delivery (IPD) is highly recommended to be utilised with building information management (BIM), specifically with BIM level-3 implementation process. Extant literature highlights the financial management challenges facing the proposed integration. These challenges are mainly related to the IPD compensation and the conventional cost control approaches that are not consistent with IPD principles. As such, this paper presents an integration of several methods to support automating risk/reward sharing amongst project parties thus enhancing IPD core team members' relationship. Design/methodology/approach: The literature review was used to highlight the challenges that face the IPD-based cost management practices such as the risk sharing/reward sharing amongst IPD core team members and potential methods to bridge the revealed IPD gap. A framework was developed by integrating the activity-based costing (ABC) – as a method to analyse the cost structure – and earned value management (EVM) to develop mathematical models that can determine the three main IPD financial transactions (i.e. …) fairly. To demonstrate the applicability of the developed system, a real-life case study was used, in which, promising results were collected in regard to visualising the cost control data and understanding of the accumulative status of the project cost and schedule for team members. Findings: A centralised cost management system (CCMS) for IPD is developed to enable the IPD cost structure as well as automating the risk-sharing/reward-sharing calculations. This system is linked with a web-based management system to display the output of proposed risk-sharing/reward-sharing models. Moreover, a novel grid is developed to show the project status graphically and to respect the diversity in core team members backgrounds. In addition, the case study showed that the proposed integration of different methods (ABC, EVM, BIM and web-based management system) is interoperable and applicable. Originality/value: This research presents a comprehensive solution to the most revealed challenges in cost management practices in IPD implementation. The outcome of this research contributes to the body of knowledge through presenting new extensions of the EVM to be used with the IPD approach to calculate risk/reward. Moreover, the implementation of the proposed tools such as centralised cost management system (CCMS) and CCMS for IPD web system will enhance/foster the implementation of the IPD in conjunction with BIM process.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | abc; BIM; cost management; evm; IPD; risk/reward sharing |
| Index terms: | implementation, costing, compensation, financial management, case study, cost management, methodology, integration, cost control, body of knowledge, management system, mathematical model, building information management, literature review, face, integrated project delivery, earned value management, project cost, project party |
| Subjects: | research methods, accounting and finance, economics, management, sociology, organizational analysis, information systems, mathematical modelling, data collection methods, control systems, dispute resolution, psychology, financial and cost management, economic analysis, data analysis and analytics, knowledge management, contractual arrangements |
| Topics: | Organizational Design, Legal Issues, Digital Applications, Procurement, Stakeholder Management, Project Management, Research Practice, Information Management, Business Strategy, Cost Management |
| Descriptive scope: | 5 PCTEA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here