Fernando, S; Panuwatwanich, K and Thorpe, D (2021) Introducing an innovation promotion model for construction projects. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 28(3), pp. 728-746. ISSN 0969-9988
Abstract
Purpose: This study aims to investigate and model the complex dynamics of innovation enablers in construction projects aiming to develop a framework identifying actions for clients to promote innovation. Design/methodology/approach: Through a comprehensive literature review, a conceptual model was previously derived to explain the client-driven enablers in promoting innovation. This was tested using the data from 131 Australian construction projects. Statistical analysis was conducted on the data using factor analysis and correlation analysis to test the model, which was validated using the case study approach. The testing and validating aspects are explained in this paper. Findings: The constructs of the recommended model are idea harnessing, relationship enhancement, incentivization and project team fitness. Research limitations/implications: The difficulty of analyzing the complex dynamics happening within projects in relation to innovation has been a barrier to progress research in this area. The introduction of this model would pave the way for researchers to explore this area with ease. Originality/value: As revealed in the detailed literature review undertaken, this is the first time that a comprehensive study has been conducted to identify client-led innovation enablers for construction projects. The results would benefit industry practitioners to achieve enhanced project outcomes in construction projects through innovation.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | client; construction industry; creativity; enablers; incentives; incentivization; innovation; organization; project level; project manager; project team; relationship |
| Index terms: | practitioner, methodology, construction project, incentivization, literature review, factor analysis, dynamics, project team, testing, construction industry, case study, project manager, promotion, creativity, statistical analysis, project outcome, correlation analysis |
| Subjects: | project delivery, data analysis and analytics, data science, professional practice, practitioner, project completion, risk assessment, profession, data collection methods, statistical analysis, innovation and creative processes, systems engineering, industry analysis, production management, research methods, management |
| Topics: | Research Practice, Project Management, Engineering Principles, Risk Management, Roles and Professions, Human Resources, Design Practice |
| Descriptive scope: | 5 PCTEA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here