Fu, J; Tian, H; Song, L; Li, M; Bai, S and Ren, Q (2021) Productivity estimation of cutter suction dredger operation through data mining and learning from real-time big data. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 28(7), pp. 2023-2041. ISSN 0969-9988
Abstract
Purpose: This paper presents a new approach of productivity estimation of cutter suction dredger operation through data mining and learning from real-time big data. Design/methodology/approach: The paper used big data, data mining and machine learning techniques to extract features of cutter suction dredgers (CSD) for predicting its productivity. ElasticNet-SVR (Elastic Net-Support Vector Machine) method is used to filter the original monitoring data. Along with the actual working conditions of CSD, 15 features were selected. Then, a box plot was used to clean the corresponding data by filtering out outliers. Finally, four algorithms, namely SVR (Support Vector Regression), XGBoost (Extreme Gradient Boosting), LSTM (Long-Short Term Memory Network) and BP (Back Propagation) Neural Network, were used for modeling and testing. Findings: The paper provided a comprehensive forecasting framework for productivity estimation including feature selection, data processing and model evaluation. The optimal coefficient of determination (R2) of four algorithms were all above 80.0%, indicating that the features selected were representative. Finally, the BP neural network model coupled with the SVR model was selected as the final model. Originality/value: Machine-learning algorithm incorporating domain expert judgments was used to select predictive features. The final optimal coefficient of determination (R2) of the coupled model of BP neural network and SVR is 87.6%, indicating that the method proposed in this paper is effective for CSD productivity estimation.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | big data; coupled model; cutter suction dredger; data mining; feature selection; outlier processing; productivity estimation |
| Index terms: | learning algorithm, big data, neural network, machine learning, data processing, methodology, estimation, back propagation, productivity, forecasting, judgment, data mining, working conditions, modelling, testing, bp neural network, monitoring |
| Subjects: | employment law, management, research methods, algorithms, information systems, dispute resolution, control systems, professional practice, data science, artificial intelligence, analytical methods, financial and cost management, prediction and forecasting |
| Topics: | Business Strategy, Cost Management, Research Practice, Engineering Principles, Site Management, Legal Issues, Digital Applications |
| Descriptive scope: | 4 PCTA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here