Implementing a HBIM approach to manage the translocation of heritage buildings

Heesom, D; Boden, P; Hatfield, A; De Los Santos Melo, A and Czarska-Chukwurah, F (2021) Implementing a HBIM approach to manage the translocation of heritage buildings. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 28(10), pp. 2948-2966. ISSN 0969-9988

Abstract

Purpose: The purpose of the paper is to present a study which exploited synergies between the fields of Heritage BIM, conservation and building translocation to develop a new approach to support a digitally enabled translocation process. The translocation (or relocation) of buildings or structures is a niche area of the construction sector and much of the significant work in this field has focused on the relocation of heritage buildings. However, hitherto there was a paucity of work between translocation and the process and technology of BIM. Design/methodology/approach: The study employed a constructive research approach to analyse the phenomenon of heritage translocation. As part of this approach, semi-structured interviews were undertaken with professionals engaged in heritage translocation projects within the UK, and this was supported by a multi-faceted review of literature within the cross cutting themes of translocation and HBIM. Building on the results, a BIM-enabled process was implemented to support the translocation of a 19th-century timber framed building in the UK. Findings: Following analysis of results of semi-structured interviews and supported by findings from prevailing literature in the field of translocation and HBIM, a HBIM for Translocation Conceptual Framework (TransHBIM) was developed. Building on the key constructs of the framework, a HBIM-based workflow was implemented to develop a digitally enabled translocation process, which provided a new approach to managing and documenting heritage translocation where disassembly and reconstruction are utilised. The workflow provided a more effective way of documenting individual elements of the building within a digital environment opening up potential for new simulation of the entire process. Originality/value: Current approaches to translocation involve traditional/manual methods of recording the building and cataloguing the key heritage elements for all aspects of the process. This new approach implements BIM technologies and processes along with the use of barcode or RFID tags to create a digital bridge between the physical elements of the building and the BIM database. This provides more accurate recording of the heritage and also opens up opportunities to support the process with additional digital simulation techniques enhancing the efficiency of the entire process.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: 4D-BIM; BIM; conservation; hbim; heritage; laser scanning; translocation
Index terms: interview, disassembly, relocation, methodology, heritage building, laser scanning, workflow, conceptual framework, construction sector, reconstruction, efficiency, database, conservation, synergy
Subjects: construction type, data collection methods, environmental policy, operations management, analytical methods, management, theoretical framing, performance management, research methods, data management, market analysis, partnership management, building construction, industry analysis
Topics: Business Strategy, Research Practice, Engineering Principles, Stakeholder Management, Construction Technology, Sustainability, Digital Applications, Quality Management, Site Management
Descriptive scope: 5 PCTEA

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here