Jiang, W; Martek, I; Hosseini, M R and Chen, C (2021) Political risk management of foreign direct investment in infrastructure projects: Bibliometric-qualitative analyses of research in developing countries. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 28(1), pp. 125-153. ISSN 0969-9988
Abstract
Purpose: Foreign direct investment in the infrastructure (FDII) of developing countries has a history of at least four decades. Bullish demand for foreign infrastructure services in developing countries, in combination with unstable political environments, has buoyed attention in political risk management (PRM). Even so, research into PRM of FDII remains fragmented and unmapped. Thus, the purpose of this paper is to identify the current body of knowledge in this area, uncover deficiencies and lay the foundation for further practical PRM research in FDII. Design/methodology/approach: This paper offers a bibliometric-qualitative review of current literature on political risk in foreign infrastructure in developing countries. A 36-year period is identified, from 1983 to 2018. Publication year, area of focus, author(s), institution and country are classified and analyzed through the medium of social network analysis. The tools used are VOSviewer, CiteSpace and Gephi to analyze citation networks of 345 published papers. Out of 345 papers, 94 highly related studies were selected for further content analysis. Findings: The study identified the research trends in related areas of PRM in infrastructure (e.g. PRM in international construction and foreign direct investment) by bibliometric analysis, which includes scattered researcher collaboration, wide-ranging and unfocused journal selection, unsystematic and discontinuous research themes. The specific research weakness in PRM in FDII is recognized by qualitative analysis from the perspective of PRM process, which reveals a lack of understanding of the impact of political risk factors, subjective risk estimations, lacking application of mature political risk database in FDII, combined with a shortage of complete and effective strategies for PRM in FDII in developing countries. Originality/value: This paper is the first of its kind, providing a comprehensive benchmark survey of the research to date in PRM in foreign infrastructure investment in developing countries. It proposes a framework of future research agenda on PRM in FDII, including special issues on this topic, identification and assessment of political risk factors with objective methods, proposition of PRM strategies on FDII with proactive and active approaches, completing strategies of PRM with reactive strategies from the perspectives of whole life cycle of infrastructure projects, political risk factors and stakeholders. It also addressed the need to investigate the suitable literature databases for researching in this area.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | construction; international construction; risk management; strategic management |
| Index terms: | whole life cycle, history, qualitative analysis, body of knowledge, strategic management, survey, collaboration, methodology, infrastructure investment, infrastructure project, international construction, database, foreign direct investment, estimation, research agenda, journal, gephi, risk factor, developing country, strategy, social network analysis, risk management, bibliometric analysis, publication, content analysis |
| Subjects: | management, research management, risk assessment, data management, architectural and construction history, research methods, data collection methods, environmental hazards, data analysis and analytics, research design and methodology, infrastructure and transport systems, research evaluation and metrics, research dissemination and communication, sustainability assessment, financial and cost management, economic analysis, development economics, knowledge management, data science, strategic management |
| Topics: | Sustainability, Research Practice, Digital Applications, Organizational Design, Cost Management, Procurement, Information Management, Business Strategy, Risk Management, International Construction, Engineering Principles |
| Descriptive scope: | 5 PCTEA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here