Jiang, W and Zhao, X (2021) Trust and the intent to cooperate in energy performance contracting for public buildings in China. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 28(1), pp. 372-396. ISSN 0969-9988
Abstract
Purpose: The purpose of this paper is to explore the key factors in generating trust, and the effects of trust on the intention to cooperate in energy performance contracting (EPC), from the perspective of energy saving companies (ESCOs). Design/methodology/approach: A questionnaire survey was undertaken to collect the data from the experienced project managers in ESCOs. Structural equation modeling was used to test the hypotheses. Findings: The results revealed that competence, integrity, communication, reciprocity and contract had positive effects on calculative trust and relational trust. Both calculative trust and relational trust, in turn, were found to have positive effects on the intention to cooperate. Research limitations/implications: The conclusions are derived from the Chinese cultural background and may apply to a certain geographical scope. In addition, this study focused on the perspective of ESCOs but did not consider that of facility owners. Practical implications: This research would supply guidance for facility owners or users to cultivate trust from ESCOs and achieve cooperation in EPC. Originality/value: Most of the existing studies have focused on the perspective of facility owners while few have attempted to investigate the perspective of ESCOs. This study contributes to the knowledge body relating to EPC by investigating the relationship between trust and the intention to cooperate from the perspective of ESCOs. In addition, most EPC studies recognized trust as a condition for the successful execution of EPC projects but failed to consider the role of trust in setting up the cooperation relationship prior to project execution.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | interview; project management; questionnaire survey |
| Index terms: | project management, energy performance, energy-saving, owner, integrity, project manager, public building, China, cooperation, questionnaire, calculative trust, methodology, competence, survey, relational trust, structural equation modelling, interview |
| Subjects: | health safety and environment, Geography, project management theory and practice, personnel development, research methods, statistical analysis, environmental hazards, sociology, construction type, profession, data collection methods, energy systems, psychology |
| Topics: | Organizational Design, Human Resources, Stakeholder Management, Roles and Professions, Sustainability, Construction Technology, Health and Safety, Geographical Context, Project Management, Research Practice |
| Descriptive scope: | 5 PCTEA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here