Study on incentive and supervision mechanisms of technological innovation in megaprojects based on the principal-agent theory

Liu, J and Ma, G (2021) Study on incentive and supervision mechanisms of technological innovation in megaprojects based on the principal-agent theory. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 28(6), pp. 1593-1614. ISSN 0969-9988

Abstract

Purpose: The high uncertainty of technological innovation in megaprojects brings great challenges to the R&D institution and also acts as a trigger for moral hazard. The incentive and supervision are effective means to improve the performance of innovation. The purpose of this paper is to propose appropriate incentive and supervision mechanisms to reduce information asymmetry and improve the efficiency of incentives. Suggestions on technological innovation are put forward to megaprojects management. Design/methodology/approach: According to the principal-agent theory, the research develops incentive models under three states, i.e. information symmetry, information asymmetry and information asymmetry based on supervision mechanism. The Bayesian theory is employed to prove the effectiveness of the novel supervision method based on risk assessment. Findings: The results indicate that under the information asymmetry, the incentive intensity is positively correlated with the social benefits coefficient, and negatively correlated with the patent benefits coefficient. The R&D effort and the owner's incentive intensity decline with the increase of information asymmetry. The supervision of risks can effectively reduce the degree of information asymmetry, and the higher the uncertainty of innovations, the more significant the effect of supervision is. As the supervision intensity increases, the incentive intensity, the R&D effort and the innovation output will increase. In addition, the R&D institutions with high innovation capability, low unit cost of R&D and low risk-aversion are more willing to make efforts to innovate. Originality/value: This study fills the research gap on incentive and supervision of technological innovation in megaprojects. The externality of innovation benefits is considered in the model. The traditional incentive model is extended through the introduction of supervision. Furthermore, a novel supervision method based on risk assessment is proposed. The results validate the importance of risk management in technological innovation and provide a new insight for project management.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: incentive and supervision; megaprojects; principal-agent theory; project management; technological innovation
Index terms: supervision, megaproject, social benefit, risk management, technological innovation, risk assessment, information asymmetry, methodology, agent, moral hazard, owner, project management, effectiveness, unit cost, efficiency
Subjects: control systems, financial and cost management, risk assessment, innovation and technology management, performance management, project management theory and practice, theoretical framing, financial risk, strategic project management, practitioner, sociology, transaction economics, research methods
Topics: Business Strategy, Roles and Professions, Cost Management, Risk Management, Engineering Principles, Stakeholder Management, Project Management, Quality Management, Research Practice
Descriptive scope: 3 PCT

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here