Collaborate to learn and learn to collaborate: A case of exploitative learning in the inter-organizational project

Liu, Y; Amini-Abyaneh, A; Hertogh, M; Houwing, E J and Bakker, H (2021) Collaborate to learn and learn to collaborate: A case of exploitative learning in the inter-organizational project. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 28(3), pp. 809-830. ISSN 0969-9988

Abstract

Purpose: Management of inter-organizational projects focuses on the collective benefits of a group of organizations on a shared activity for a limited period and the coordination among them. However, how learning is facilitated in the inter-organizational project remains under-developed in the literature. Design/methodology/approach: This research analyses the exploitative learning process in the longest tunnel project on land in the Netherlands realized in a densely populated area. Data were collected through archived documents, in-depth interviews, site visits in the ethnographic research to analyze the actors, the daily practices and social situations in projects. Findings: The empirical findings indicate that exploitative learning is promoted positively between the owner and the contractor and internally within the contractor. The most significant change that the exploitative learning process has led to is the change in mindset toward the collaboration. Project culture is considered to be shaped by exploitative learning in the inter-organizational project. However, there is a gap between the transfer of knowledge from the inter-organizational project to the parent organization. Originality/value: The findings have implications for understanding learning in the inter-organizational project setting.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: construction; innovation; knowledge management
Index terms: interview, tunnel, mindset, Netherlands, collaboration, methodology, documents, knowledge management, owner, inter-organizational project, land, coordination
Subjects: real estate economics, data collection methods, health behaviours and lifestyles, sociology, infrastructure and transport systems, management, research methods, organizational theory, Geography, professional development
Topics: Stakeholder Management, Information Management, Engineering Principles, Geographical Context, Project Management, Research Practice, Organizational Design, Urban Studies
Descriptive scope: 4 PCTE

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here