Ma, Z; Chong, H Y and Liao, P C (2021) Development of a time-variant causal model of human error in construction with dynamic Bayesian network. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 28(1), pp. 291-307. ISSN 0969-9988
Abstract
Purpose: Human error is among the leading causes of construction-based accidents. Previous studies on the factors affecting human error are rather vague from the perspective of complex and changeable working environments. The purpose of this paper is to develop a dynamic causal model of human errors to improve safety management in the construction industry. A theoretical model is developed and tested through a case study. Design/methodology/approach: First, the authors defined the causal relationship between construction and human errors based on the cognitive reliability and error analysis method (CREAM). A dynamic Bayesian network (DBN) was then developed by connecting time-variant causal relationships of human errors. Next, prediction, sensitivity analysis and diagnostic analysis of DBN were applied to demonstrate the function of this model. Finally, a case study of elevator installation was presented to verify the feasibility and applicability of the proposed approach in a construction work environment. Findings: The results of the proposed model were closer to those of practice than previous static models, and the features of the systematization and dynamics are more efficient in adapting toward increasingly complex and changeable environments. Originality/value: This research integrated CREAM as the theoretical foundation for a novel time-variant causal model of human errors in construction. Practically, this model highlights the hazards that potentially trigger human error occurrences, facilitating the implementation of proactive safety strategy and safety measures in advance.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | case study; construction safety; construction site; risk management; simulation |
| Index terms: | dynamics, risk management, construction work, implementation, construction industry, case study, safety measures, bayesian network, methodology, construction safety, safety management, sensitivity analysis, static model, strategy, construction site |
| Subjects: | operations management, work location, modelling and simulation, contractual arrangements, data collection methods, risk assessment, occupational health and safety management, probabilistic model, industry analysis, environmental health, environmental hazards, systems engineering, management, research methods, health safety and environment |
| Topics: | Health and Safety, Business Strategy, Engineering Principles, Project Management, Research Practice, Risk Management, Sustainability, Procurement, Digital Applications, Site Management |
| Descriptive scope: | 5 PCTEA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here