Owusu-Manu, D G; Debrah, C; Amissah, L; Edwards, D J and Chileshe, N (2021) Exploring the linkages between project managers' mindset behaviour and project leadership style in the Ghanaian construction industry. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 28(9), pp. 2690-2711. ISSN 0969-9988
Abstract
Purpose: Leadership encapsulates a process of influencing others to understand what needs to be done and how it can be done. The related area of mindset behaviour which moderates leadership styles adopted in various industries has hitherto received scant academic attention in a construction context. This paper thus explores the linkages between project manager's mindset behaviour and project leadership style in the construction industry. Design/methodology/approach: Literature reviewed provides the basis for a questionnaire data collection instrument developed to gather primary data from construction professionals in the Ghanaian construction industry (GCI). A quantitative research strategy was then adopted using the Relative Importance Index (RII) to determine the level of significance of the leadership and mindset archetypes. A Pearson's correlation test was run to ascertain whether the mindset behaviour of project managers has a significant impact upon the type of leadership style. Findings: The study's results indicate that democratic, transformational and situational leadership styles were prevalent leadership styles in the GCI. The analysis also revealed that project managers favoured the “growth mindset”. Furthermore this style had a moderate positive relationship with democratic and transformational leadership styles. Conversely, a fixed mindset had a low positive relationship with autocratic and situational leadership styles but a low negative relationship with transformational leadership style. Research limitations/implications: This research provides sufficient data for project managers to identify the type of mindset to nurture (the growth mindset is recommended) and the effective leadership style to be employed. This study engenders wider discussion on mindset behaviour and project leadership style in developing countries. Moreover, the findings present policymakers and practitioners with the leadership styles to promote and develop (democratic, transformational and situational) and mindset behaviour (growth mindset) to ensure project success in Ghana and other developing countries. Originality/value: This research represents the first comprehensive study appraising the linkages between project managers' mindset behaviour and project leadership style in the construction industry. Empirical data presented bridge the identified knowledge gap that exists on the lack of theoretical understanding of the influence that project managers' mindset has on leadership styles in the GCI.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | construction; fixed mindset; growth mindset; leadership style; mindset behaviour; project managers |
| Index terms: | construction professional, archetype, construction industry, transformational leadership, project manager, quantitative research, project success, linkage, Ghana, methodology, questionnaire, practitioner, developing country, mindset, strategy, relative importance index, leadership style |
| Subjects: | practitioner, health behaviours and lifestyles, data collection methods, profession, risk assessment, business, data analysis and analytics, modelling and simulation, Geography, professional development, development economics, project management theory and practice, management, research methods, leadership, industry analysis |
| Topics: | International Construction, Organizational Design, Business Strategy, Geographical Context, Project Management, Research Practice, Information Management, Roles and Professions, Risk Management |
| Descriptive scope: | 4 PCTA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here