Pan, W; Chen, L and Zhan, W (2021) Positioning construction workers' vocational training of guangdong in the global political-economic spectrum of skill formation. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 28(9), pp. 2489-2515. ISSN 0969-9988
Abstract
Purpose: This paper explores the vocational training of construction workers in Guangdong Province of China and identifies its position in the global political-economic spectrum of skill formation. Design/methodology/approach: The paper reviews construction vocational education and training (VET) of major political economies to develop a theoretical framework that guides an in-depth case study of Guangdong. Document analysis, field trip observations, meetings and semi-structured interviews were combined to explore the political-economic environment, political stakeholders and quality assurance mechanisms of industrial training in Guangdong's construction sector. The findings were compared with construction VET of other economies reported in the literature. Findings: Construction training in Guangdong is deeply rooted in the local history and culture, under strong dominance of the state, while continually evolves to respond to the fluid market and therefore can be conceptualised as “market-in-state”. The political stakeholders are embedded within the state to ensure that skills policies are implemented in-line with industry policies. The differences between the training of Guangdong and its foreign counterparts are attributed to their divergent political-economic models. Research limitations/implications: As the case study was undertaken only with Guangdong, the generalisability of its findings can be improved through future research within a broader context of multiple provinces of China through both qualitative and quantitative research approaches. Practical implications: Plausible foreign VET approaches are likely adaptable to the Chinese context only when conducive political-economic environment could be enabled. The findings are useful for developing countries to learn from the VET experience of industrialised economies. Construction workers' training in Guangdong can be improved by strengthening labour regulation at lower subcontracting levels and ensuring the presence of industrial associations and unions for collective training supervision. Originality/value: The paper contributes to the field of construction engineering and management with a theoretical framework that guides empirical studies on the influence of the political-economic environment upon the ways political stakeholders develop and participate in construction VET. The exploration based on this framework revealed the position of the vocational training of construction workers in Guangdong in the global political-economic spectrum of skill formation.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | China; construction industry; guangdong; political economy; skill formation; vocational education and training |
| Index terms: | quality assurance, vocational training, developing country, interview, China, history, construction sector, methodology, exploration, regulation, strengthening, subcontracting, economic model, document analysis, quantitative research, case study, construction industry, vocational education and training, construction worker, supervision, political economy, empirical study, construction engineering, presence |
| Subjects: | environmental resource management, modelling and simulation, data science, data analysis and analytics, environmental science, architectural and construction history, data collection methods, organization, economic and policy analysis, practitioner, control systems, industry analysis, student development, quality assurance, political science, structural engineering, research methods, engineering methods, Geography, professional development, development economics |
| Topics: | Quality Management, Supply Chain Management, International Construction, Education, Research Practice, Geographical Context, Project Management, Engineering Principles, Roles and Professions, Sustainability, Governance |
| Descriptive scope: | 5 PCTEA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here