Adopting a semi-ideographic approach to cash flow forecasting

Evans, R C; Kaka, A P and Lewis, J (1997) Adopting a semi-ideographic approach to cash flow forecasting. In: Stephenson, P (ed.) Proceedings of 13th Annual ARCOM Conference, 15-17 September 1997, Cambridge, UK.

Abstract

Cash flow forecasting is an important part of the management of a construction company. A large proportion of construction company bankruptcy is due to poor financial planning. Many of today's cash flow forecasting models rely on standard S-curves. A standard S-curve is often chosen from a library of curves developed by calculating the average monthly percentage values of a group of completed projects . Therefore a single standard S-curve is often used to represent many projects that belong to a particular group. In this paper, the authors demonstrate that the above approach (i.e. nomothetic models) will not always yield the most accurate results. The paper proposes that an idiographic (a specific curve for a specific project) model should be adopted instead. The paper begins by describing briefly a nomothetic model which was developed using 150 projects. This model was based on groups classified in terms of duration and cost. The models were then modified to be able to incorporate the affects of the actual duration of the project concerned. The paper concludes by testing the accuracy of the proposed idiographic models. The results confirm that better accuracy is achieved when using this approach.

Item Type: Conference Paper (Paper)
Uncontrolled Keywords: cash flow; nomothetic model; financial planning
Index terms: construction company, accuracy, financial planning, cash flow, cash flow forecasting, testing, bankruptcy, duration, s-curve
Subjects: financial and cost management, economic analysis, professional practice, organization, project controls, professional development, economics, financial management
Topics: Time Control, Business Strategy, Cost Management, Information Management, Engineering Principles
Descriptive scope: 2 PC

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here