Model selection criteria in building project price forecast formulation

Fortune, C and Hinks, J (1997) Model selection criteria in building project price forecast formulation. In: Stephenson, P (ed.) Proceedings of 13th Annual ARCOM Conference, 15-17 September 1997, Cambridge, UK.

Abstract

Clients of the building industry expect to obtain high levels of quality from all decision makers involved with the delivery of their projects. High quality forecasts of the construction costs of potential buildings are central to the estimation of a scheme's value for money. The decisions that effect the quality levels of such forecasts involve the selection of appropriate models and the exercising of professional judgement, both in the formulation of the advice itself and in its transmission to the client. This paper addresses issues connected with the formulation of early stage building project price advice for clients. Initially, the paper reviews, identifies and classifies factors identified from both domain specific and general business literature that are thought to influence practitioner selection of building project price forecasting models. This analysis is used as a basis for the development of a preliminary conceptual model selection framework. The paper concludes by describing a research design that will be used to be collect data to support that the development of a decision support mechanism for building project price forecasting model selection.

Item Type: Conference Paper (Paper)
Uncontrolled Keywords: building project price models; formulation; selection criteria
Index terms: price forecasting model, building industry, practitioner, selection criteria, value-for-money, decision support, research design, construction cost, estimation
Subjects: research design and methodology, practitioner, economic analysis, financial and cost management, tendering, evaluation, decision analysis, industry analysis
Topics: Value Management, Procurement, Risk Management, Roles and Professions, Research Practice, Cost Management, Business Strategy
Descriptive scope: 2 PC

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here