Xiang, L; Tan, Y; Jin, X and Shen, G (2021) Understanding stakeholders' concerns of age-friendly communities at the briefing stage: A preliminary study in urban China. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 28(1), pp. 31-54. ISSN 0969-9988
Abstract
Purpose: This study aims to identify the stakeholders and critical factors (CFs) of promoting age-friendly communities (AFCs), discuss the relationship between the stakeholders and CFs and develop a preliminary framework for the briefing stage of promoting AFCs in urban China. Design/methodology/approach: Stakeholders and CFs were identified through literature review and document analysis. The Delphi method was used to screen the extracted stakeholders and CFs. The focus group methodology was applied to obtain evaluation matrices of relationships between stakeholders and CFs. A two-mode social network was formed to analyse the evaluation matrices generated. Findings: Results of the analyses indicate that local governments and policymaking institutions, together with project investors, obtained high prioritisations in the stakeholders' group, whilst senior citizens and caregivers appear to rank last. For CFs, communities' environmental factors receive the most attention from stakeholders. Research limitations/implications: Results of the analyses can only show similarities of the participating stakeholders' opinions on their concerns, and provide researchers and practitioners with initial ideas on analysing stakeholders and CFs at the briefing stage of promoting AFCs. For a specific project, the concerns and prioritisations would change. Diverse voices are necessary and case studies are in need. Practical implications: Challenges in promoting AFCs in urban China are discussed, and a preliminary framework of the briefing stage is developed for practitioners to follow when promoting AFCs. Originality/value: This study discusses which CFs should be considered priorities and what consensuses are generally reached by stakeholders. CFs are utilised to interpret stakeholders' relationships, influences and concerns on AFC projects when conducting the social network analysis (SNA).
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | age-friendly community; briefing stage; critical factor; focus group discussion; social network analysis; stakeholder |
| Index terms: | focus group, document analysis, environmental factor, social network analysis, China, social network, literature review, methodology, practitioner, case study, local government, briefing, critical factor, investor, Delphi method |
| Subjects: | sociology, Geography, practitioner, research methods, environmental science, data analysis and analytics, data science, administrative law, scope management, data collection methods, risk assessment |
| Topics: | Geographical Context, Roles and Professions, Project Management, Research Practice, Legal Issues, Risk Management, Stakeholder Management, Sustainability |
| Descriptive scope: | 5 PCTEA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here