Innovative design for sustainability: Integrating embodied impacts and costs during the early design phase

Zeng, R; Chini, A and Ries, R (2021) Innovative design for sustainability: Integrating embodied impacts and costs during the early design phase. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 28(3), pp. 747-764. ISSN 0969-9988

Abstract

Purpose: As green building movement is widespread throughout the world, low-energy building becomes the standard. A designer's selection of building systems and materials during early design phase becomes more important. It is essential that designers include embodied energy and emissions among other criteria they use in selecting materials during the design development phase of a building. The aim of this study is to develop a model to integrate the embodied energy, embodied emissions, and cost of the alternative structure and envelope systems of a building during the design development stage. Design/methodology/approach: A conceptual model is proposed to integrate the embodied energy, embodied emissions, and cost of the alternative structure and envelope systems of a building. A case study is used to test the proposed model in predicting the embodied impacts and cost of structure and envelope systems for an educational building. Findings: The proposed model can assist designers in making informed decisions at the early design stage and selecting alternative structure and envelope systems considering embodied impacts and costs. Social implications: Designers consider reducing embodied impacts of buildings during early design phase as an important social responsibility, especially for megaprojects, which have great impact on our daily life. Originality/value: Development of a model that can be used to support design decisions regarding sustainable design (embodied energy and embodied carbon emissions) and costs of buildings in early design phase.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: buildings; cost; early design phase; embodied emissions; embodied energy; life cycle assessment
Index terms: designer, low-energy building, case study, design development, embodied energy, embodied emission, early design stage, building system, design phase, life cycle assessment, embodied carbon, sustainable design, educational building, movement, social responsibility, megaproject, design decision, methodology, green building
Subjects: design practice, energy efficiency, research methods, health safety and environment, design process, profession, construction type, data collection methods, environmental impact, engineering systems, health behaviours and lifestyles, energy systems, professional practice, strategic project management
Topics: Health and Safety, Engineering Principles, Project Management, Research Practice, Roles and Professions, Sustainability, Construction Technology, Design Practice
Descriptive scope: 4 PCTE

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here