Zhang, L and Sun, H (2021) The impacts of ethical climate on knowledge contribution loafing among designers in engineering design firms: Mediated effect of knowledge leadership. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 28(6), pp. 1807-1827. ISSN 0969-9988
Abstract
Purpose: Knowledge contribution loafing as one of the major obstacles to knowledge sharing among designers in engineering design firms impedes better achievement of engineering design. The purpose of this paper is to examine different types of ethical climate impacts on knowledge contribution loafing among designers through the mediating effect of knowledge leadership. Design/methodology/approach: By adopting a quantitative research design, data were collected using a survey questionnaire from 352 designers in engineering design firms. The data were analyzed using the partial-least squares structural equation modeling approach to test hypotheses. Findings: Ethical climate is an important factor to affect knowledge contribution loafing among designers, and three types of ethical climate (self-interest, social responsibility and law/professional codes) have different degrees of influence on knowledge contribution loafing. In addition, knowledge leadership can alleviate knowledge contribution loafing, and it is a mediator between ethical climate and knowledge contribution loafing. Practical implications: Engineering design firms should cultivate and strengthen the role of social responsibility, law/professional codes and knowledge leadership and reduce the influence of self-interest to mitigate the negative of knowledge contribution loafing among designers. Originality/value: By identifying ethical climate as a novel influence factor for knowledge contribution loafing, this research further highlights the role of different types of ethical climate in an engineering design context. Moreover, it delves deeply into the issue around different types of ethical climate affect knowledge contribution loafing among designers through the role of knowledge leadership. This broadens the understanding of how ethical climate affects knowledge contribution loafing among designers in the engineering design organizations and enriches knowledge management literatures in engineering design industry.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | engineering design firms; ethical climate; knowledge contribution loafing; knowledge leadership |
| Index terms: | designer, quantitative research, mediator, engineering design, survey, knowledge sharing, structural equation modelling, knowledge management, social responsibility, questionnaire, methodology |
| Subjects: | data analysis and analytics, knowledge management, dispute resolution, data collection methods, profession, statistical analysis, professional development, design process, health safety and environment, research methods |
| Topics: | Roles and Professions, Information Management, Research Practice, Health and Safety, Digital Applications, Legal Issues |
| Descriptive scope: | 5 PCTEA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here