Do, S T; Nguyen, V T and Dang, C N (2022) Exploring the relationship between failure factors and stakeholder coordination performance in high-rise building projects: Empirical study in the finishing phase. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 29(2), pp. 870-895. ISSN 0969-9988
Abstract
Purpose: This study aims to discover the impact of failure factors on stakeholder coordination performance (SCP) in the finishing phase of high-rise building projects. Design/methodology/approach: Firstly, this study identifies potential failure factors affecting coordination performance as well as criteria for measuring SCP in the finishing phase of high-rise building projects. Afterwards, a survey questionnaire is designed to collect data from high-rise building projects in Vietnam. Using the factor analysis method, the study discovers the failure constructs. A structural equation model is then built to uncover the relationships between failure constructs and SCP. Findings: The study identified four failure constructs which could significantly affect SCP, namely traditional adversarial relationship (TAR), incompetent parties (IP), poor project planning and organization (PPO) and delays of parties toward construction works (DP). The developed model indicated that TAR, PPO and IP significantly affected stakeholders' coordination performance in the finishing phase of high-rise building projects. Originality/value: The results of the study fill the gap in knowledge by discovering the causal relationships between failure constructs and SCP in high-rise building projects. The results might provide an initial guideline for stakeholders during the finishing phase of high-rise building projects to enhance their coordination performance.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | failure factors; finishing phase; high-rise building projects; stakeholder coordination performance; structural equation model |
| Index terms: | survey, Vietnam, failure factor, high-rise building, project planning, methodology, questionnaire, coordination, empirical study, structural equation model, factor analysis, construction work |
| Subjects: | statistical analysis, Geography, research methods, management, operations management, control systems, data collection methods, construction type, risk assessment |
| Topics: | Organizational Design, Risk Management, Construction Technology, Research Practice, Geographical Context, Project Management |
| Descriptive scope: | 5 PCTEA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here