What drives clients to purchase green building? The cybernetic fuzzy analytic hierarchy process approach

Durdyev, S; Mohandes, S R; Mahdiyar, A and Ismail, S (2022) What drives clients to purchase green building? The cybernetic fuzzy analytic hierarchy process approach. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 29(10), pp. 4015-4039. ISSN 0969-9988

Abstract

Purpose: Homebuyers' motivation to purchase the green building (GB) is vital for the widespread adoption of greener practices and for tackling the adverse impact of the built environment. In this regard, through the lenses of qualified and competent GB developers (GBD) and real estate agents (REAs) using judgment sampling technique, this paper aims to evaluate the factors stimulating the purchase intention of Malaysian homebuyers. Design/methodology/approach: The study uses the interval-valued fuzzy Delphi method (IVFDM) to identify influential factors, while the cybernetic fuzzy analytic hierarchy process (CFAHP) for prioritizing the identified factors according to their significance in nationwide promotion of GBs is utilized. Findings: The findings, which are consistent with those reported in the literature and validated by the focus group, uncover the most prominent factors that drive the purchase intention of GB homebuyers. The results indicate that the homebuyers are familiar with the benefits of GB; however, the benefits are not sufficient to overcome the perceived “high cost” of green practices. Hence, homebuyers still seek financial incentives, which is a clear indication that financial issues are the most motivating factor. Practical implications: Increase in informative promotion of GB is necessary, particularly among prospective homebuyers in developing countries where GB adoption is in its infancy. Frontline players (those who are responsible for wider promotion) can utilize the factors that this study found to be important to identify appropriate steps to increase prospective homebuyers' motivation for purchasing greener dwellings. Originality/value: The contribution of this paper is threefold. First, review and identification of the most cited determinants that have been reported in the context of the subject. Second, this paper presents the most significant determinants in a developing country setting through the lenses of Malaysian experts in the area. Third, improvement measures could be implemented in Malaysia and other developing countries to promote the GB paradigm with an aim to make the building environment more sustainable.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: construction; decision support systems; methodology
Index terms: determinant, fuzzy analytic hierarchy process, fuzzy Delphi, paradigm, real estate, built environment, sampling, purchasing, Malaysia, judgment, prioritizing, promotion, agent, influential factor, methodology, green building, motivation, financial incentive, developing country, focus group, decision support
Subjects: dispute resolution, practitioner, data collection methods, risk assessment, economic analysis, real estate economics, psychology, development economics, Geography, research methods, design practice, education and knowledge transfer, management, decision-making and optimization, infrastructure and transport systems, procurement strategy, decision analysis
Topics: Urban Studies, Legal Issues, Design Practice, International Construction, Human Resources, Risk Management, Roles and Professions, Procurement, Business Strategy, Research Practice, Geographical Context
Descriptive scope: 5 PCTEA

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here