Tri-optimization of building shape and envelope properties using taguchi and constraint limit method

Lin, Y and Yang, W (2022) Tri-optimization of building shape and envelope properties using taguchi and constraint limit method. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 29(3), pp. 1284-1306. ISSN 0969-9988

Abstract

Purpose: The purpose of this paper is to present a tri-optimization approach to optimize design solutions regarding the building shape and envelope properties considering their implications on thermal comfort, visual comfort and building energy consumption (EN). The optimization approach has been applied to obtain the optimal design solutions in five typical cities across all climatic regions of China. Design/methodology/approach: The method comprises a tri-optimization process with nine main steps to optimize the three objectives (thermal comfort, visual comfort and building EN). The design variables considered are four types of building shape (pyramid, rectangular, cylindrical and dome shape) and different envelope properties (insulation thickness [INS] of external walls/roof, window type [WT] and window-to-envelop surface area ratio [WESR]). The optimization is performed by using the Taguchi and constraint limit method. Findings: The results show that the optimal design solutions for all climatic regions favor cylindrical shape and triple-layer low-E glazing window. The highest insulation level of 150 mm is preferred in three climatic regions, and the INS of 90 mm is preferred in the other two climate regions. In total, 10% WESR is preferred in all climatic regions, except the mild region. When the constraint limit of lighting intensity requirement by Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design (LEED) is applied, the rectangular shape building is the optimal solution for those with 10% WESR. Research limitations/implications: The method proposed in the paper is innovative in that it optimizes three different objectives simultaneously in building design with better accuracy and calculation speed. Practical implications: Building designers can easily follow the proposed design guide in their practice which effectively bridges the gap between theory and practice. The optimal design solutions can provide a more comfortable living environment and yet less EN, which can help achieve the sustainability requirement of green buildings. Social implications: The solutions presented in the paper can serve as a useful guide for practical building designers which creates economic and commercial impact. In addition, the theory and practical examples of the study can be used by building regulators to improve the energy-efficient building design standard in China. Originality/value: The research is the first attempt that adopts tri-optimization approach to generate the optimal solutions for building shape and envelope design. The tri-optimization approach can be used by building designers to generate satisfactory design solutions from the architectural viewpoint and meanwhile to find combinations of the building shape and envelope properties that lead to design solutions with optimal building performance.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: building shape; energy consumption; optimization; taguchi and constraint limit method; thermal comfort; visual comfort
Index terms: visual comfort, energy-efficient building, roof, insulation, energy consumption, thermal comfort, environmental design, glazing, designer, regulator, building energy consumption, building design, China, methodology, window, green building, building performance, accuracy, thickness, design standard
Subjects: sociology, environmental engineering, quality assurance, research methods, design practice, architectural elements, professional development, Geography, sustainable design, technical documentation, sustainability and energy, building materials, architectural design, energy systems, profession, materials science
Topics: Engineering Principles, Information Management, Geographical Context, Research Practice, Roles and Professions, Stakeholder Management, Sustainability, Design Practice, Quality Management
Descriptive scope: 3 PCT

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here