A phase-oriented evaluation framework for China's PPP projects

Liu, J; Guo, Y; Martek, I; Chen, C and Tian, J (2022) A phase-oriented evaluation framework for China's PPP projects. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 29(9), pp. 3737-3753. ISSN 0969-9988

Abstract

Purpose: This study develops a phase-oriented evaluation mechanism based on the public–private partnership (PPP) project process and provides a preliminary framework for the promotion of the phase-oriented evaluation of PPPs in China. Design/methodology/approach: Through a literature review and survey interviews the success criteria for the implementation process of PPPs are documented. Process success criteria findings are used to populate the content of the phase-oriented evaluation. The result is then tested, revised and improved through follow-up expert interviews. Findings: This paper identifies PPP project process success criteria. Using these criteria, a phase-oriented evaluation framework is developed. Moreover, in consultation with industry experts in the PPP field, eight evaluation aspects were determined: confirmation of project compliance and performance, confirmation of value for money, confirmation of financial affordability, trend analysis of annual performance appraisal, risk review and early warning, rebankability analysis, project externality analysis, benchmarking analysis of similar projects. These eight application aspects are analyzed in the light of the outcomes of the resulting phase-oriented evaluation framework. Research limitations/implications: The results of the research can only provide researchers and practitioners with generic insights regarding inputs into a phase-oriented evaluation of PPP projects. For any specific PPP project, the focus and priority of the evaluative content will vary. Practical implications: A phase-oriented evaluation of PPP projects is put forward. This will allow project stakeholders to better track the progress of projects throughout what can be a lengthy implementation stage. Originality/value: This study can provide governments and stakeholders with a new, theoretical understanding as to factors required of an effective phased evaluation of China's PPP projects. In that regard it will be significant value in PPP project policy and decision-making.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: phase-oriented evaluation; PPP; process performance
Index terms: implementation, partnership, promotion, appraisal, China, affordability, benchmarking, process performance, value-for-money, decision-making, methodology, project stakeholder, practitioner, literature review, early warning, survey, interview, success criteria, compliance, evaluation
Subjects: health safety and environment, Geography, financial risk, evaluation, management, factor and component analysis, performance measurement, research methods, partnership management, assessment methods, decision analysis, sociology, practitioner, data collection methods, data analysis and analytics, contractual arrangements, economic analysis
Topics: Human Resources, Quality Management, Value Management, Roles and Professions, Stakeholder Management, Risk Management, Procurement, Cost Management, Business Strategy, Health and Safety, Geographical Context, Project Management, Research Practice
Descriptive scope: 5 PCTEA

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here