Mahmoud, A S; Hamdan Ahmad, M; Mohd Yatim, Y and Aminu Dodo, Y (2022) Safety performance framework at construction site for self-regulation by building developers. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 29(9), pp. 3394-3414. ISSN 0969-9988
Abstract
Purpose: This study proposes a self-regulatory framework to enhance safety performance at the construction stage among building developers. Design/methodology/approach: Extant literature identified 137 potential factors that influence the construction safety performances of building developers. Focus group discussions and interviews were conducted with 11 panels of experts and professionals. The Relative Importance Index (RII) was used to analyse the response feedback described in a similar paper. In this study, the survey tool used was set up with 40 variables grouped into eight latent variables in the framework, which were agreed and certified as “extremely important” by the panel. Based on random sampling, data were collected from 229 valid respondents. Structural equation modelling (SEM) technique using Smart PLS software was then used to analyse the respondent's feedback. Findings: The results show that safety administration and processes, effective communication of safety behaviour, significantly influenced safety performance on a construction site with β values of 0.330 and 0.431 along with t values of 3.005 and 2.547 at p < 0.1, respectively. These factors, among others, provide a distinct approach to understanding and improving on-site construction safety. The study findings will potentially benefit building professionals and other stakeholders by improving awareness of safety practices. Research limitations/implications: The study may not have covered all possible factors that influence the construction safety performance of building developers. Also, the generalizability and transferability of the research outcome to the construction industry wide use is also limited when reference is made to the characteristics of the research respondents and/or participants. In addition, validation of the framework by five professionals is rather small. Practical implications: Theoretically, the framework through the identified factors provide a distinct approach to understanding and improving on-site construction safety through voluntary adherence to self-regulatory standard where there are no enforceable laws and regulations to promote safety. The study findings will potentially benefit building professionals and other stakeholders by improving awareness of the health and safety practices of the construction industry. Originality/value: Many research efforts have developed frameworks and models for construction safety. However, the particularity of these frameworks to countries other than Nigeria requires similar research to be conducted to enhance the safety performance of building developers.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | building developers; construction safety performance; health and safety; safety performance framework; self-regulations |
| Index terms: | survey, construction site, structural equation modelling, relative importance index, focus group, health and safety, interview, health and safety practices, safety performance, construction safety, validation, self-regulation, regulation, methodology, safety behaviour, Nigeria, construction industry, sampling, building professional |
| Subjects: | occupational health and safety management, statistical analysis, political science, environmental health, behavioral psychology, industry analysis, research methods, professional development, Geography, health safety and environment, work location, profession, risk assessment, data collection methods |
| Topics: | Health and Safety, Geographical Context, Research Practice, Information Management, Roles and Professions, Risk Management, Governance, Sustainability, Site Management |
| Descriptive scope: | 5 PCTEA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here