Team composition in relational contracting (RC) in large infrastructure projects: A belbin's team roles model approach

Rahmani, F; Scott-Young, C; Tadayon, A and van der Walt, J D (2022) Team composition in relational contracting (RC) in large infrastructure projects: A belbin's team roles model approach. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 29(5), pp. 2027-2046. ISSN 0969-9988

Abstract

Purpose: The aim of this study is to broaden the understanding of the set of knowledge, skills, attributes and experience (KSAE) that teams should demonstrate and the necessary roles they need to play within the team in Relational Contracting (RC). This research seeks to answer three questions: first, what KSAEs are required in a team operating under RC, second, which of the identified KSAEs are more important to enable an integrated team to perform effectively and third, how do these required KSAEs correspond to the major role clusters identified in Belbin’s team role model? Design/methodology/approach: In-depth interviews with 25 experts and key management representatives in infrastructure construction in Australia were conducted to enable detailed discussion of the research questions. Findings: Sixteen behavioural traits and four knowledge and experience areas were identified. The findings highlight that in RC, team members and especially leaders and managers need to be competent in people-oriented roles, above all others. Research limitations/implications: This research mainly captured the perspectives of personnel working in state government infrastructure departments. Further research is recommended to explore the perceptions of employees in private construction companies. Practical implications: By aligning the roles required for RC with the team role clusters of the Belbin’s team roles assessment tool, this study will be useful for identifying suitable members to form high-performance project teams. Originality/value: The findings of this paper can inform government infrastructure organisations and construction companies as to which roles are more critical when selecting fit-for-purpose teams to successfully deliver large infrastructure projects procured under the RC method.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: belbin’s team roles model; construction; rc; relational contracting; relational team composition
Index terms: Australia, role model, relational contracting, project team, construction company, large infrastructure project, manager, personnel, interview, team composition, infrastructure construction, integrated team, methodology
Subjects: sociology, research methods, civil engineering, management, infrastructure engineering, Geography, project delivery, contractual arrangements, organization, data collection methods, practitioner
Topics: Organizational Design, Human Resources, Procurement, Roles and Professions, Engineering Principles, Geographical Context, Project Management, Research Practice, Business Strategy
Descriptive scope: 4 PCTE

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here