Rezakhani, P (2022) Project scheduling and performance prediction: A fuzzy-Bayesian network approach. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 29(6), pp. 2233-2244. ISSN 0969-9988
Abstract
Purpose: Despite the extensive research in project risk management and availability of several techniques and tools, quantifying uncertainty in project schedules remains a challenge. Current risk analysis models suffer from several shortcomings that need to be addressed to provide more reliable and valid schedules. This paper aims to present a dynamic decision support system with the purpose of providing project managers with necessary tool for making real-time informed decisions. Design/methodology/approach: The proposed approach incorporates the widely accepted critical path method (CPM) calculations in a Bayesian network (BN). BN is employed to conduct inferencing and causal analysis and provide probabilistic results, which can improve the decision-making process. Time parameters of each activity in the CPM network is modeled by a set of simulation nodes in the BN. Prior probability distribution of activities duration is extracted from experts using a fuzzy analytical solution. Findings: The model proposed in this paper is able to address some key outstanding issues of current project scheduling techniques through: (1) modeling the causality among different sources of schedule uncertainty, (2) minimizing uncertainty in experts' evaluations, (3) assessing effects of unknown risk factors and (4) using actual activity data for learning the behavior of project and predicting crew productivity. Originality/value: The purposed methodology provides a framework for the new generation of project schedule analysis tools that are better informed by available knowledge and data, and hence, more reliable and useful.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | Bayesian network; decision support tool; fuzzy set theory; project control; project scheduling; risk assessment |
| Index terms: | project control, modelling, duration, risk factor, risk assessment, probability distribution, bayesian network, project risk management, fuzzy set theory, performance prediction, decision-making process, project manager, crew productivity, critical path method, risk analysis, methodology, decision support, project scheduling |
| Subjects: | financial risk, research methods, performance management, management, environmental hazards, statistical analysis, decision-making and optimization, probabilistic model, decision analysis, project controls, control systems, profession, analytical methods, operations research |
| Topics: | Quality Management, Digital Applications, Site Management, Time Control, Project Management, Research Practice, Engineering Principles, Cost Management, Sustainability, Roles and Professions, Risk Management |
| Descriptive scope: | 4 PCTA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here