Sandanayake, M; Yang, W; Chhibba, N and Vrcelj, Z (2022) Residential building defects investigation and mitigation: a comparative review in Victoria, Australia, for understanding the way forward. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 29(9), pp. 3689-3711. ISSN 0969-9988
Abstract
Purpose: The issue of building defects is a growing concern that affects all major construction stakeholders as a result of costs and time implications of reworks. The magnitude of the problem is severe with statistics highlighting defects often result in 4% of the total cost of construction of a building. Despite the importance of this problem, studies have seldom considered development of systematic approaches to enhance the quality control process in construction. Design/methodology/approach: Building defects is a growing concern that affects all major construction stakeholders because of costs and time implications of reworks. Magnitude of the problem is severe with statistics highlighting defects often result in 4% of the total cost of construction of a building. Despite the importance, studies have seldom considered development of systematic approaches to enhance the quality control process in construction. Findings: Results indicated that poor workmanship is the main cause of building defects and incomplete works is a frequently detected defect type. Results categorised defects based on cost and frequency to identify the severity. Findings also identified four focus areas including control measures, technology use audit and inspections and promotion of best knowledge. Research limitations/implications: The study lacks generalisation as it covers only Victorian scenario and further studies are needed to generalise the findings. Originality/value: The study provides a deeper understanding of the challenges currently facing the residential construction industry in Victoria, Australia, and underlines the need for developing quantitative models and methodologies to improve current processes, practices and policies for effective defects minimisation in Victoria, Australia. The systematic methodological framework can also be adopted by researches across the globe to effectively analyse the options for minimising residential building defects.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | building inspections; compliance; defects; regulations; residential buildings; workmanship |
| Index terms: | investigation, residential construction, quality control, statistics, option, residential building, promotion, Victoria, audit, Australia, inspection, methodology, regulation, mitigation, workmanship, compliance, building defect, minimization, rework |
| Subjects: | operations management, regions and continents, project delivery, professional practice, mathematical modelling, construction type, data collection methods, decision analysis, political science, quality assurance, construction integration, algorithms, research methods, performance measurement, management, financial risk, Geography, health safety and environment, contractual condition |
| Topics: | Construction Technology, Governance, Risk Management, Project Management, Geographical Context, Research Practice, Business Strategy, Cost Management, Health and Safety, Contract Administration, Human Resources, Quality Management, Design Practice, Digital Applications |
| Descriptive scope: | 4 PCTA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here