Using issue logs to improve construction project performance

Shalwani, A and Lines, B (2022) Using issue logs to improve construction project performance. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 29(2), pp. 896-915. ISSN 0969-9988

Abstract

Purpose: The Project Management Body of Knowledge recommends the use of issue logs as a best practice to minimize the potential project cost and schedule growth. Although the broader topic of project control has been widely studied in the construction literature, the specific application of issue logs has remained relatively understudied. This study aims to analyze the extent and consistency with which construction teams utilize issue logs and the corresponding project performance outcomes. Design/methodology/approach: A dataset of 5,635 individual issues was gathered from the final issue logs of 881 small building projects delivered via the design–bid–build method. Differences between groups were determined using the Kruskal–Wallis H test with post hoc testing via the Mann–Whitney U test with pairwise comparison. Findings: The results showed that, on average, project teams who used issue logs to a greater extent achieved a 3.1 to 4.3% reduction in cost growth and a 5.3 to 12.3% reduction in schedule growth. This result shows that issue logs can be used to improve construction project performance in the areas of cost and schedule. Originality/value: This result provides a contribution to practitioners, wherein project teams should be encouraged to establish their issue management practices early in the project schedule to encourage greater issue log usage for the remainder of the project.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: cost growth; issue log; issue management; project control; schedule growth
Index terms: practitioner, construction project, management practice, methodology, dataset, body of knowledge, project cost, project performance, schedule growth, best practice, project control, project team, project management, testing, construction team
Subjects: research methods, economics, management, project management theory and practice, production management, project controls, data management, business, practitioner, control systems, project delivery, professional practice, knowledge management
Topics: Digital Applications, Time Control, Cost Management, Business Strategy, Research Practice, Project Management, Information Management, Engineering Principles, Roles and Professions
Descriptive scope: 3 PCT

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here