Tandon, U; Mittal, A; Bhandari, H and Bansal, K (2022) E-learning adoption by undergraduate architecture students: Facilitators and inhibitors. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 29(10), pp. 4287-4312. ISSN 0969-9988
Abstract
Purpose: This study identifies the facilitators and inhibitors for the adoption of e-learning for the undergraduate students of architecture. Nine constructs are identified as facilitators and five constructs are identified as inhibitors to the adoption of online learning systems in the context of the study. These constructs were used to propose a research model. Design/methodology/approach: 596 architecture undergraduates responded to a structured questionnaire. The questionnaire was finalized after a pilot study and included standard scale items drawn from previous studies. An exploratory factor analysis was followed by structural equation modeling (SEM) to test the proposed model. Findings: All the identified facilitators emerged significant except social influence and price value. Furthermore, technology risk emerged insignificant while all other inhibitors had significant impact on Behavioral Intention to adopt e-learning. Research limitations/implications: The study has strong implications in academia as HEIs in developing countries need to make their students computer proficient, boost the implications of e-learning services by mitigating risks and motivating students to acquire knowledge through flexible e-learning modules. Originality/value: The COVID-19 pandemic forced educational institutions to switch to online modes of learning. For students of architectural programs in a developing country like India, this has been unprecedented and has brought in a new set of challenges and opportunities. With the extension of the pandemic induced lockdown in educational institutions, students – and other stakeholders – have no choice but to adapt to this new normal of dependence on remote learning.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | architecture courses; behavioral intention; drivers of e-learning; e-learning; perceived risks; utaut2 |
| Index terms: | academia, program, undergraduate, questionnaire, developing country, COVID-19, facilitator, structural equation modelling, India, pandemic, e-learning, exploratory factor analysis, module, methodology |
| Subjects: | development economics, educational technology, data collection methods, educational institutions, Geography, practitioner, research methods, statistical analysis, health risk and incident analysis, architectural elements, software systems, curriculum development |
| Topics: | Design Practice, Health and Safety, Research Practice, International Construction, Geographical Context, Education, Roles and Professions, Digital Applications |
| Descriptive scope: | 4 PCTA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here