Green project management from employees' perspective in Hong Kong's engineering and construction sectors

To, W M and Lam, K H (2022) Green project management from employees' perspective in Hong Kong's engineering and construction sectors. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 29(4), pp. 1890-1907. ISSN 0969-9988

Abstract

Purpose: The study investigates employees' perceptions of green project management in Hong Kong's engineering and construction sectors. Design/methodology/approach: Green project management attributes were identified and categorized in terms of organization and process aspects based on a literature review. A questionnaire was developed to collect responses from employees working in Hong Kong's engineering and construction sectors. Findings: Respondents perceived “using Design for Environment approach,” “training employees about green project management” and “recycling the used or excessive materials/components” as the most important attributes. Generally, females gave higher importance ratings than males to most attributes. Respondents who had higher education qualifications or held senior positions perceived green project management attributes as more important than their counterparts with lower education qualifications or in lower positions. Green project management was found to have four distinct factors: “Management Commitment,” “Green Technologies and Processes,” “Green Partnerships” and “External Communication.” Originality/value: The study is one of the first empirical works on green project management in Hong Kong's engineering and construction sectors. It demonstrates that green project management should be characterized as a multidimensional concept.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: green project management; Hong Kong; importance rating; organization attributes; process attributes
Index terms: questionnaire, methodology, construction sector, literature review, commitment, project management, qualification, Hong Kong, higher education, partnership, recycling
Subjects: data collection methods, waste management, psychology, data analysis and analytics, educational resources, research methods, project management theory and practice, Geography, educational institutions, partnership management, industry analysis
Topics: Sustainability, Stakeholder Management, Geographical Context, Project Management, Research Practice, Organizational Design, Education
Descriptive scope: 4 PCTA

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here