A Bayesian belief network predictive model for construction delay avoidance in the UK

Wang, P; Fenn, P; Wang, K and Huang, Y (2022) A Bayesian belief network predictive model for construction delay avoidance in the UK. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 29(5), pp. 2011-2026. ISSN 0969-9988

Abstract

Purpose: The purpose of this research is to advise on UK construction delay strategies. Critical delay factors were identified and their interrelationships were explored; in addition, a predictive model was established upon the factors and interrelationships to calculate delay potentials. Design/methodology/approach: The critical causes were identified by a literature review, verified by an open-ended questionnaire survey and then analysed with 299 samples returned from structured questionnaire surveys. The model consisted of factors screened out by Pearson product–moment correlational coefficient, constructed by a logical reasoning process and then quantified by conducting Bayesian belief networks parameter learning. Findings: The technical aspect of construction project management was less critical while the managerial aspect became more emphasised. Project factors and client factors present relatively weak impact on construction delay, while contractor factors, contractual arrangement factors and distinctively interaction factors present relatively strong impact. Research limitations/implications: This research does not differentiate delay types, such as excusable vs non-excusable ones and compensable vs non-compensable ones. The model nodes have been tested to be critical to construction delay, but the model structure is mostly based on previous literature and logical deduction. Further research could be done to accommodate delay types and test the relationships. Originality/value: This research updates critical delay factor list for the UK construction projects, suggesting general rules for resource allocation concerning delay avoidance. Besides, this research establishes a predictive model, assisting delay avoidance strategies on a case-by-case basis.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: construction; novel model; project management; questionnaire survey; risk management
Index terms: project management, interaction, construction project management, risk management, resource allocation, questionnaire, methodology, construction delay, construction project, bayesian belief network, survey, literature review, strategy, reasoning
Subjects: cognitive psychology, probabilistic model, project controls, behavioral psychology, research methods, management, project management theory and practice, production management, resource management, data analysis and analytics, risk assessment, data collection methods
Topics: Risk Management, Project Management, Research Practice, Business Strategy, Site Management, Time Control, Digital Applications
Descriptive scope: 5 PCTEA

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here