Factors influencing transaction costs of prefabricated housing projects in China: Developers' perspective

Wu, H; Qian, Q K; Straub, A and Visscher, H J (2022) Factors influencing transaction costs of prefabricated housing projects in China: Developers' perspective. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 29(1), pp. 476-501. ISSN 0969-9988

Abstract

Purpose: The recent promotion of prefabricated housing (PH) in China has resulted in a prosperous period for its implementation. However, transaction costs (TCs) cause low economic efficiency to stakeholders and hinder the further promotion of PH. No relevant study has yet been made to investigate the TCs and their causes in the PH field. This paper identifies critical TCs and explores the influencing factors from the developers' perspective. Design/methodology/approach: Semi-structured interviews and a questionnaire survey were used to collect data about TCs and influencing factors. The most influential factors are identified with their impacts on particular TCs, yielded from correlation analysis and logistic regression. Findings: From the developers' perspective in China's PH market, this study identified that the most concerning sources of TCs are: hidden costs arising from disputes, extra workloads from design changes, learning costs, intensive communication and coordination in assembly and unexpected information costs in decision-making. The use of an ordered logistic regression approach indicates that the four most influential factors are: qualification of the general contractor, mandatory local policies, owner type and competitiveness of the developer. Practical implications: To reduce the TCs, experiencing learning and ensuring the design scheme's complicity are recommended to save information searching and exchanging costs. The implications for the PH developers are for them to: (1) professionalize their own organization and (2) procure high-qualified general contractors. For the policymakers, this means they should improve the clarity of the mandatory local policies for PH step-by-step. Originality/value: By applying the TCs economic theory, this study explores factors that influence TCs in the PH industry. It sheds light on the influencing mechanism behind the TCs in the context of prefabricated housing.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: developers; ordered logistic regression; prefabricated housing; stakeholders; transaction cost
Index terms: implementation, coordination, competitiveness, owner, dispute, economic theory, correlation analysis, efficiency, influencing factor, logistic regression, qualification, promotion, China, housing, decision-making, methodology, influential factor, questionnaire, general contractor, design change, housing project, survey, workload, interview, transaction cost
Subjects: housing and residential development, market analysis, decision analysis, sociology, financial analysis, statistical analysis, management, research methods, educational resources, performance management, Geography, contractual arrangements, economic analysis, data collection methods, risk assessment, construction type, practitioner, dispute resolution
Topics: Legal Issues, Urban Studies, Quality Management, Human Resources, Education, Organizational Design, Cost Management, Business Strategy, Research Practice, Geographical Context, Risk Management, Stakeholder Management, Roles and Professions, Procurement, Construction Technology
Descriptive scope: 5 PCTEA

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here