Yan, P; Liu, J; Zhao, X and Skitmore, M (2022) Risk response incorporating risk preferences in international construction projects. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 29(9), pp. 3499-3519. ISSN 0969-9988
Abstract
Purpose: The objective of this research is to develop a decision method that can generate appropriate risk response strategies for international construction project managers (PMs) and allow these strategies to reflect their different risk preferences. Design/methodology/approach: The optimal model approach is adopted. A credibility-based fuzzy chance constrained programming (CFCCP) model is developed, which simultaneously minimizes the expected losses of risk events and total costs of risk response. To solve this multi-objective model, a fuzzy interactive solution method is used. Moreover, the model performance is demonstrated by a real international industrial plant project. In addition, a sensitivity analysis of the model is conducted. Findings: The result of the sensitivity analysis indicates that PMs with a greater risk aversion can lead to a higher mitigation ratio of expected losses of risk events and a higher total cost of risk response. Practical implications: This research provides contractors with an effective decision-making model to develop a project risk response plan, and it will assist contractors to minimize risk losses and enhance the project performance in the international construction market. Originality/value: Previous studies overlook the risk preference, which is an important behavioral factor influencing decisions in risk response strategy selection. This research proposed a novel risk response strategy selection decision method that considers different attitudes toward risk among decision makers.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | credibility theory; fuzzy chance constrained programming; international construction projects; risk preference; risk response strategies |
| Index terms: | international construction, project performance, risk response strategy, programming, mitigation, decision-making, methodology, international construction project, preference, sensitivity analysis, manager, risk response, strategy |
| Subjects: | strategic management, practitioner, programming, decision analysis, environmental hazards, decision-making and reasoning, research methods, management, financial risk, project management theory and practice |
| Topics: | Sustainability, Roles and Professions, Risk Management, Project Management, Research Practice, Cost Management, Business Strategy, International Construction, Digital Applications |
| Descriptive scope: | 3 PCT |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here