Abbasianjahromi, H and Aghakarimi, M (2023) Safety performance prediction and modification strategies for construction projects via machine learning techniques. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 30(3), pp. 1146-1164. ISSN 0969-9988
Abstract
Purpose: Unsafe behavior accounts for a major part of high accident rates in construction projects. The awareness of unsafe circumstances can help modify unsafe behaviors. To improve awareness in project teams, the present study proposes a framework for predicting safety performance before the implementation of projects. Design/methodology/approach: The machine learning approach was adopted in this work. The proposed framework consists of two major phases: (1) data collection and (2) model development. The first phase involved several steps, including the identification of safety performance criteria, using a questionnaire to collect data, and converting the data into useful information. The second phase, on the other hand, included the use of the decision tree algorithm coupled with the k-Nearest Neighbors algorithm as the predictive tool along with the proposing modification strategies. Findings: A total of nine safety performance criteria were identified. The results showed that safety employees, training, rule adherence and management commitment were key criteria for safety performance prediction. It was also found that the decision tree algorithm is capable of predicting safety performance. Originality/value: The main novelty of the present study is developing an integrated model to propose strategies for the safety enhancement of projects in the case of incorrect predictions.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | construction industry; decision tree algorithm; knn; safety performance |
| Index terms: | integrated model, implementation, construction industry, project team, decision tree, strategy, commitment, unsafe behaviour, machine learning, model development, safety performance, construction project, methodology, questionnaire |
| Subjects: | data collection methods, psychology, analytical methods, project delivery, contractual arrangements, artificial intelligence, research methods, management, financial risk, production management, decision analysis, occupational health and safety management, industry analysis |
| Topics: | Risk Management, Procurement, Cost Management, Business Strategy, Health and Safety, Research Practice, Project Management, Information Management, Engineering Principles, Organizational Design, Digital Applications |
| Descriptive scope: | 4 PCTA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here