A framework for continuation of digitalization in construction: A PLS-SEM approach

Bajpai, A and Misra, S C (2023) A framework for continuation of digitalization in construction: A PLS-SEM approach. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 30(10), pp. 4715-4734. ISSN 0969-9988

Abstract

Purpose: Indian construction firms are falling behind in the use of digital technology in the workplace, and this study aims to give a framework and assess the role of enablers in the implementation and continuing digitalization of the Indian construction sector. Design/methodology/approach: An exploratory qualitative research technique is used in this article, and multiple detailed interviews and surveys are done with professionals from the industry and academia. To conclude the significance and relevance of the different constructs and indicators, the partial least square-structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM) approach is used. Findings: Barriers are essential enablers for effective implementation, while success factors are important drivers for the successful continuance of digitalization in the construction sector. However, stakeholders' perceived benefit has a substantial role in both implementation and continuance. Research limitations/implications: In this research paper, the scope of this investigation for a generalized exploratory study is restricted to construction firms within India. Further, a rigorous longitudinal study may also be performed to examine the subjectivity of the responses in order to ensure digital continuation. This study identifies limited manifest indicators. Additional indications, however, may be included based on the other company's resources, structure and geographic location. Practical implications: The study's findings have two implications. In the beginning, it gives a direction to the construction sector by highlighting the framework in which implementation and continuance both should have to be executed, and this is the critical area for the successful continuance of digitalization in construction. Second, the research shows that the digitalization process is similar to the adoption of innovation, in which the deployment and persistent use of the new technology are important for facilitating the transformation. Originality/value: In two respects, the study is distinctive. To begin, this is one of the limited efforts to comprehend digitalization from the Indian perspective. Second, the study reveals that the PLS-SEM approach can be effectively used in the developing subject of the construction digitalization concept.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: continuation of digitalization; digital framework; measurement model; PLS-SEM; structural model
Index terms: transformation, new technology, implementation, India, academia, investigation, survey, exploratory study, success factor, construction firm, subjectivity, structural equation modelling, digitalization, research paper, interview, partial least square, digital technology, construction sector, methodology, qualitative research
Subjects: educational institutions, industry analysis, statistical analysis, research methods, Geography, digital technology, contractual arrangements, innovation and technology management, health monitoring assessment and metrics, research dissemination and communication, data collection methods, research design and methodology, organization, business, computing systems, human factors and perception
Topics: Procurement, Geographical Context, Research Practice, Information Management, Engineering Principles, Business Strategy, Health and Safety, Education, Digital Applications
Descriptive scope: 5 PCTEA

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here