Chen, Y; Cai, X; Li, J; Lin, P; Song, H; Liu, G; Cao, D and Ma, X (2023) The values and barriers of BIM implementation combination evaluation based on stakeholder theory: A study in China. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 30(7), pp. 2814-2836. ISSN 0969-9988
Abstract
Purpose: This paper aims to the perspective of stakeholders, from external variables of the Building Information Modeling (BIM) system, users, task flow, the nature of the development of the execution process, organizational structure and policy impacts, that established a relationship among the internal concepts and intentions for the BIM application, individual or organizational differences, controlling interference factors and environmental constraints, discussed the combination of the values and barriers of BIM implementation. Design/methodology/approach: Through the co-occurrence statistics and genre analysis based on co-citation context analysis and constructs the common information that impacts the combination of values and barriers of BIM implementation. Then, the paper chose the expert database of the green construction and intelligent building branch of the China construction association, and obtained 104 sample data through modified snowball sampling, using exploratory factor analysis with factor load linear functions, combined factor variance contribution rate weights.actor variance contribution rate weights. Findings: The results show that eight aspects can be defined as the values of BIM implementation (VI), and the barriers of BIM implementation (BI) mainly come from five aspects caused by insufficient cognition and two aspects of an uncertain value in China. Originality/value: This research reflects a combined evaluation of the values of BIM implementation and barriers of BIM and highlights the significance of the sustainable development of BIM technology and the value of building future informatization applications.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | building information modelling; combination evaluation; stakeholders; implementation; value |
| Index terms: | implementation, intelligent building, database, methodology, statistics, variance, building information modelling, sampling, policy impact, sustainable development, exploratory factor analysis, cognition, China, organizational structure |
| Subjects: | sociology, data collection methods, health safety and environment, research methods, information systems, data management, policy studies, cognitive psychology, mathematical modelling, Geography, statistical analysis, measurement and scaling, design practice, contractual arrangements |
| Topics: | Design Practice, Governance, Procurement, Geographical Context, Organizational Design, Digital Applications, Research Practice, Health and Safety |
| Descriptive scope: | 5 PCTEA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here