Deep, S; Joshi, R and Patil, S (2023) Identifying the contractor's core competencies in post-COVID-19 scenario: Developing a survey instrument. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 30(9), pp. 3781-3797. ISSN 0969-9988
Abstract
Purpose: Construction industry is one of the worst affected sectors due to the impact of the current coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) outbreak. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to identify the key competencies that should be demonstrated by the contractors in the post-COVID-19 scenario to make them resilient to the adverse impact of pandemic outbreaks. Design/methodology/approach: A survey instrument was developed using an extensive literature review and was tested using a pilot study. It was then administered online using survey monkey to 900 respondents, out of which 324 complete responses were obtained. The data analysis was performed using exploratory factor analysis and second-order confirmatory factor analysis. Findings: After analyzing the data, it was identified that the most critical competence was managing site safety (standard factor loading (SFL) = 0.91), followed by leadership skills (SFL = 0.88), technical competence (SFL = 0.81), managing supply chain disruption (SFL = 0.73) and financial stability (SFL = 0.48) that were found to be less essential from the respondents' point of view. Originality/value: The study is first of its kind to identify the core competencies that should be demonstrated by the contractors to cope with COVID-19-induced disruptions. The findings of this article can be used by the practitioners to develop policies and procedures for selection of contractors.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | competencies; COVID-19; general contractors; procurement; project delivery |
| Index terms: | outbreak, pandemic, project delivery, coronavirus, construction industry, loading, data analysis, COVID-19, exploratory factor analysis, survey, confirmatory factor analysis, general contractor, literature review, stability, practitioner, methodology, competence |
| Subjects: | project delivery, data analysis and analytics, construction operations, data collection methods, practitioner, health conditions and diseases, statistical analysis, industry analysis, research methods, health risk and incident analysis, structural engineering, personnel development |
| Topics: | Site Management, Human Resources, Procurement, Roles and Professions, Engineering Principles, Research Practice, Health and Safety |
| Descriptive scope: | 5 PCTEA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here