Strategies for implementation of green roofs in developing countries

Durdyev, S; Koc, K; Karaca, F and Gurgun, A P (2023) Strategies for implementation of green roofs in developing countries. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 30(6), pp. 2481-2502. ISSN 0969-9988

Abstract

Purpose: Reportedly, green roof (GR) makes a significant contribution towards a truly sustainable-built environment; however, its implementation is yet to hit a sufficient level in developing countries. Thus, this study assesses GR implementation strategies in developing countries by providing a comparative analysis through experts in Kazakhstan, Malaysia and Turkey. Design/methodology/approach: The study adopts a four-step methodological approach to achieve the research aim: literature review, focus group discussion, fuzzy analytical hierarchy process (FAHP) analysis and correlation analyses. First, a literature review followed by a focus group discussion is used to determine 18 (out of 25 initially) strategies for the selected context and these are classified into three categories: governmental and institutional support, knowledge and information and policy and regulation. Afterward, the identified GR strategies are evaluated using the FAHP with the data gathered from the experts in the countries studied. Finally, correlation analyses were used to observe the strength of agreement between the assessments of experts from the included countries. Findings: The findings indicate that financial incentives, low-cost government loans and subsidies and tax rebates are the essential strategies for the wider adoption of GR. Evaluating the policy and regulations strategies also showed that mandatory GR policies and regulations and better enforcement of the developed GR policies are ranked as the most prominent strategies. The findings show a low level of agreement among respondents from Kazakhstan, while there is a high level of agreement between the experts in Malaysia and Turkey. Research limitations/implications: The research contribution is twofold. First (research implication), the study identifies the strategies through a complete literature review. Second, the identified strategies are evaluated through the lenses of experts in three developing countries which are hoped to provide (practical contribution) a better understanding of the most effective strategies that require attention and enable the frontline stakeholders (particularly government authorities) to focus on them. Originality/value: The study findings provide a good point of departure to explore the strategies for broader adoption of GRs in developing economic setting.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: built environment; developing countries; green building; green roofs; sdg11; sdg9; strategies; sustainability; sustainable construction
Index terms: green building, regulation, Kazakhstan, green roof, methodology, focus group, sustainable construction, developing country, financial incentive, comparative analysis, strategy, literature review, built environment, analytical hierarchy process, enforcement, implementation, low level, Turkey, Malaysia, subsidy, correlation analysis
Subjects: economic analysis, contractual arrangements, data analysis and analytics, data collection methods, measurement and scaling, statistical analysis, political science, decision-making and optimization, infrastructure and transport systems, research methods, design practice, management, development economics, sustainable construction, health safety and environment, sustainable design, Geography
Topics: Health and Safety, Business Strategy, Geographical Context, Research Practice, Governance, Sustainability, Procurement, Urban Studies, Design Practice, International Construction
Descriptive scope: 5 PCTEA

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here