Gan, X L; Xie, K; Liu, H; Rameezdeen, R and Wen, T (2023) A bibliometric and content analysis of policy instruments on facilitating the development of prefabricated construction in China. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 30(9), pp. 3976-3996. ISSN 0969-9988
Abstract
Purpose: The purpose of this paper is to analyse the policy instruments used by the China's Government on prefabricated construction (PC) development, with the aim to clarify the pattern and discover the focus of the policy instruments using the methods of bibliometric analysis and content analysis. Design/methodology/approach: Through a thorough screening by all researchers, 25 policies were identified from 1995 to 2021 were selected and analysed. The external attribute analysis clarified the issuing year, organisation, and the format of each policy. The content analysis was adopted firstly to analyse the policy instrument. An analysis framework including environmental instruments, supply instruments and demand instruments was applied in categorising and counting of each policy instrument. The bibliometric analysis was then carried out to extract keywords of the policy instruments, construct a co-word network and complete the cluster analysis. Findings: The results indicate that the policies lack consistency and had relatively low authority. The results of content analysis show that the policy system relies heavily on environmental and supply instruments, whilst the use of demand instruments seems to be grossly inadequate. The results of the bibliometric analysis identify the core ideas of each policy instrument category, discuss the existing problems and then put forward the corresponding countermeasures. Research limitations/implications: This study comprehensively and systematically analysed the policy instruments on facilitating the development of PC in China which broaden the research perspectives of the PC development by introducing the methods of political science. The research findings afford helpful information for future policy adjustments and elucidate the effective delivery of policies to facilitate PC development for developing countries. Originality/value: This study provides an in-depth understanding of policy instruments used by China's Government on PC development. By integrating the policy instrument analysis framework into the mixed methods of content analysis and bibliometric analysis, this study provides an innovative way to conduct policy instrument analysis.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | bibliometric analysis; China; content analysis; policy instruments; prefabricated construction |
| Index terms: | screening, mixed method, content analysis, science, bibliometric analysis, developing country, China, policy instrument, cluster analysis, methodology |
| Subjects: | specialized education, data collection methods, policy studies, data analysis and analytics, Geography, development economics, management, research methods, research evaluation and metrics |
| Topics: | Research Practice, Geographical Context, Information Management, Governance, Human Resources, International Construction, Education |
| Descriptive scope: | 5 PCTEA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here