Gounder, S; Hasan, A; Shrestha, A and Elmualim, A (2023) Barriers to the use of sustainable materials in Australian building projects. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 30(1), pp. 189-209. ISSN 0969-9988
Abstract
Purpose: Although the adverse effects of construction activities on the environment and the need for sustainable construction practices are recognised in both research and practice, any significant shift in the selection and use of construction materials from the sustainability perspective has not taken place in many building projects. Still, conventional construction materials are widely used in building projects in both developed and developing countries. This study attempts to identify the main barriers to the use of sustainable materials in building projects in an advanced economy such as Australia. Design/methodology/approach: This study adopted a questionnaire survey approach to examine the main reasons behind the low usage of sustainable materials in building projects. Based on the relative importance index, exploratory factor analysis and multinomial logistic regression analysis, the study examined the main barrier measures and barrier factors to the use of sustainable materials in building projects. Findings: The findings reveal that critical barriers to the use of sustainable materials are related to cost and profit considerations, the unwillingness of the key stakeholders to incorporate these materials into building projects, lack of incentives and government policies. The factor analysis reduced the critical barrier measures into three factors: techno-economic considerations, cost and delay concerns and resistance to use. Furthermore, multinomial regression analysis based on the extracted factors identified techno-economic considerations as the main barrier factor to the use of sustainable materials in building projects. Practical implications: The empirical results of this research can inform construction practitioners, organisations and policymakers on how to increase the use of sustainable building materials in the construction industry. Originality/value: Identification of barriers to the use of sustainable building materials is a prerequisite to improve their uptake and use in the construction industry. The study fills a gap in the existing research on the use of sustainable materials in building projects in Australia.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | Australian construction industry; building projects; sustainability; sustainable materials |
| Index terms: | sustainable construction practice, exploratory factor analysis, developing country, profit, construction practitioner, survey, relative importance index, questionnaire, multinomial, sustainable building material, methodology, sustainable material, Australia, construction activity, factor analysis, government policy, construction material, logistic regression analysis, regression analysis, construction industry |
| Subjects: | sustainable construction, development economics, professional development, Geography, research methods, statistical analysis, industry analysis, sustainable materials, risk assessment, data collection methods, economic analysis, construction operations, public policy, building materials |
| Topics: | International Construction, Site Management, Geographical Context, Research Practice, Construction Materials, Information Management, Engineering Principles, Business Strategy, Governance, Sustainability, Risk Management |
| Descriptive scope: | 5 PCTEA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here