Identification of barriers, benefits and opportunities of using bamboo materials for structural purposes

Hailemariam, E K; Hailemariam, L M; Amede, E A and Nuramo, D A (2023) Identification of barriers, benefits and opportunities of using bamboo materials for structural purposes. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 30(7), pp. 2716-2738. ISSN 0969-9988

Abstract

Purpose: Bamboo is still a traditional material that requires additional development before it can be considered as a modern and reliable alternative to steel, wood, and concrete. When compared to the huge volumes of information available on timber and concrete, bamboo has a little quantity of information. When it comes to estimating bamboo structures, there are not many options. As a result, pinpointing the key qualities and events that aid or impede bamboo's integration into the construction sector is vital. Design/methodology/approach: Factor analysis (FA) was used for summarizing and reducing data to significant ones in identifying barriers, benefits and potentials of using bamboo materials for construction. In this method, small number of factors was aimed at to explain most of the variances observed in a much larger number of variables. The goal was to identify not-directly-observable barriers and opportunities based on a larger set of observable or measurable indicators identified from literature. It attempted to identify underlying challenges and potentials that lay the patterns of bamboo material usage in the construction sector. Findings: From the results of FA, six specific components with loadings greater than 0.5 were kept for both the barrier and the advantages of using bamboo Lack of awareness on bamboo material, Unorganized supply chain, Exclusion from standards, Outperformance of industrial products, Lack of innovation and institutional support and Bamboo's mechanistic limitation was considered to be the root causes of all barriers. On the other end, structural suitability of bamboo, viable timber alternative, meeting sustainability's demand, attractive economic model, cost effective material, positive social implications were labeled as benefits of bamboo. Finally, major recommendation regarding research, facility, institutionalizing and resource management were forwarded. Originality/value: Ethiopia is a major bamboo producer in Africa. The bamboo sector, on the other hand, remains a part of the undeveloped and informal rural economy, preventing it from reaching its full potential. Despite technological advancements, bamboo is not commonly used in construction. As a result, using bamboo as a building material is frowned upon. In order to take effective action to accommodate bamboo as an alternative building material, significant challenges, benefits, and potential of the material must be stated with this purpose in mind.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: bamboo material; barriers and benefits; construction material; factor analysis; principal component analysis; structural material
Index terms: option, resource management, loading, building material, factor analysis, construction material, principal component analysis, economic model, wood, Africa, bamboo, variance, estimating, construction sector, suitability, integration, methodology, Ethiopia
Subjects: control systems, building materials, modelling and simulation, construction operations, financial and cost management, regions and continents, traditional and composite building materials, research methods, Geography, organizational analysis, measurement and scaling, decision analysis, design criteria, industry analysis, statistical analysis
Topics: Design Practice, Site Management, Organizational Design, Cost Management, Engineering Principles, Construction Materials, Research Practice, Geographical Context, Project Management, Risk Management
Descriptive scope: 4 PCTA

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here