Huang, N; Du, Q; Zou, P X W and Huang, Y (2023) Analysis of key factors influencing green highway project development focusing on network interaction and project success: Evidence from China. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 30(8), pp. 3203-3223. ISSN 0969-9988
Abstract
Purpose: This study aims to analyze the interaction and key factors within the network of factors influencing the success of green highway projects. Design/methodology/approach: Through literature review and interviews with experienced project managers, this study identified 33 influencing factors from the perspectives of stakeholders and life cycle. The interaction between these influencing factors was determined by surveying different experts, most of whom have participated in green highway projects in China. Then, social network analysis (SNA) was used to explore the impact and control ability of different factors. Findings: According to the prioritization of these factors, the results showed that some key factors were identified, especially incremental cost, lack of standards and regulations, development of innovative technologies and materials, public awareness and environmental protection behavior. Finally, some meaningful suggestions were put forward for different influencing factors of green highway projects. Research limitations/implications: While the key influencing factors of the green highway projects have been identified by considering the interrelationships between different factors, the specific influencing paths and levels of different factors are not analyzed, more studies and methods should be conducted on this area in the future. Practical implications: This finding of factors influencing the success of green highway projects which is useful for managers to overcome various obstacles encountered in similar projects. Moreover, considering the interaction among the influencing factors enables managers to make systematic and efficient decisions. Social implications: Developing green highways have been perceived as a major innovation to help achieve the synergy of environmental protection, economic development and social responsibility. Studying the key factors influencing the success of green highway projects and putting forward targeted suggestions are crucial for promoting the environmental protection transformation of highway construction. Originality/value: Compared with most studies on the identification of key influencing factors of construction projects, this research emphasized the interaction between different factors within the system in the analysis process. The findings could provide useful references to promote the successful implementation of green highway projects.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | green highway; influencing factors interaction; project success; social network analysis |
| Index terms: | social network analysis, literature review, surveying, environmental protection, manager, interview, economic development, social responsibility, China, regulation, evidence, methodology, construction project, transformation, life cycle, project success, project manager, influencing factor, synergy, interaction, implementation, highway construction |
| Subjects: | project management theory and practice, production management, health safety and environment, Geography, research methods, civil engineering, economic development, behavioral psychology, political science, environmental engineering, partnership management, value management, practitioner, business, data collection methods, evaluation and assessment methods, risk assessment, profession, health monitoring assessment and metrics, data analysis and analytics, contractual arrangements |
| Topics: | Research Practice, Geographical Context, Project Management, Engineering Principles, Business Strategy, Health and Safety, Procurement, Sustainability, Governance, Risk Management, Stakeholder Management, Roles and Professions |
| Descriptive scope: | 5 PCTEA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here