Joseph, V R and Mustaffa, N K (2023) Carbon emissions management in construction operations: A systematic review. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 30(3), pp. 1271-1299. ISSN 0969-9988
Abstract
Purpose: The demand to reduce carbon emissions has become an increasingly important social factor due to the unprecedented impacts of climate change. However, most existing publications have focused on minimizing emissions during the operational phase of buildings. At the same time, there is a lack of comprehensive research conducted on carbon emissions, specifically during the construction phase. The purpose of this paper is to identify, review and classify current practices related to carbon emissions management in construction operations to gain greater insight into how to reduce and mitigate emissions and achieve more sustainable solutions. Design/methodology/approach: This study reviewed the published literature on carbon emissions from construction. A total of 198 bibliographic records were extracted from the Scopus collection database and analyzed using Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA). PRISMA is used as a basis for reporting possible trends, research methods and strategies used in published literatures. A total of 99 papers related to carbon emissions in the construction operations were further reviewed and analyzed. This review paper draws on existing research and identifies current carbon management patterns in construction projects. Findings: Data indicated an upward trend in the number of publications in carbon emissions research during the last few years, particularly in 2015, 2017 and 2019. The most significant contributions to the domain were reported from China, Europe and the USA. This paper found that most studies conduct the Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) method to estimate carbon emissions. This paper found that the primary studies have focused on construction machinery and equipment emissions. The strategies such as establishing uniform standards for carbon emissions policies and regulations, equipment and logistic planning and low carbon design material will potentially impact carbon emissions reductions. Practical implications: This paper provides information that will be beneficial for the construction industry to design and manage construction operations. It will also be of interest to those looking to reduce or manage construction emissions. Originality/value: Although there is a diversity of current thinking related to the practical estimation and management of carbon emissions in construction projects, there is no consolidated set of keys of standardized carbon emissions management in practice. By assessing the existing paradigms of carbon assessment methods and tactics in the construction industry, this study contributed to the existing knowledge base by providing insights into current techniques in the construction sector for monitoring and mitigating emissions.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | carbon emissions; carbon reduction; construction operation; management; systematic review |
| Index terms: | paradigm, strategy, construction project, China, low carbon, regulation, carbon reduction, publication, systematic literature review, estimation, construction industry, monitoring, knowledge base, climate change, construction operation, meta-analysis, methodology, social factor, construction sector, database, Europe, estimate, construction phase, carbon emission, life cycle assessment |
| Subjects: | sociology, environmental impact, project delivery, research methods, information systems, construction operations, data management, political science, education and knowledge transfer, control systems, management, industry analysis, climate science, sustainability assessment, financial and cost management, research dissemination and communication, Geography, research evaluation and metrics, physical geography and landforms, production management |
| Topics: | Geographical Context, Information Management, Business Strategy, Governance, Site Management, Project Management, Research Practice, Digital Applications, Cost Management, Sustainability |
| Descriptive scope: | 5 PCTEA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here