Prediction of construction accident outcomes based on an imbalanced dataset through integrated resampling techniques and machine learning methods

Koc, K; Ekmekcioğlu, Ö and Gurgun, A P (2023) Prediction of construction accident outcomes based on an imbalanced dataset through integrated resampling techniques and machine learning methods. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 30(9), pp. 4486-4517. ISSN 0969-9988

Abstract

Purpose: Central to the entire discipline of construction safety management is the concept of construction accidents. Although distinctive progress has been made in safety management applications over the last decades, construction industry still accounts for a considerable percentage of all workplace fatalities across the world. This study aims to predict occupational accident outcomes based on national data using machine learning (ML) methods coupled with several resampling strategies. Design/methodology/approach: Occupational accident dataset recorded in Turkey was collected. To deal with the class imbalance issue between the number of nonfatal and fatal accidents, the dataset was pre-processed with random under-sampling (RUS), random over-sampling (ROS) and synthetic minority over-sampling technique (SMOTE). In addition, random forest (RF), Naïve Bayes (NB), K-Nearest neighbor (KNN) and artificial neural networks (ANNs) were employed as ML methods to predict accident outcomes. Findings: The results highlighted that the RF outperformed other methods when the dataset was preprocessed with RUS. The permutation importance results obtained through the RF exhibited that the number of past accidents in the company, worker's age, material used, number of workers in the company, accident year, and time of the accident were the most significant attributes. Practical implications: The proposed framework can be used in construction sites on a monthly-basis to detect workers who have a high probability to experience fatal accidents, which can be a valuable decision-making input for safety professionals to reduce the number of fatal accidents. Social implications: Practitioners and occupational health and safety (OHS) departments of construction firms can focus on the most important attributes identified by analysis results to enhance the workers' quality of life and well-being. Originality/value: The literature on accident outcome predictions is limited in terms of dealing with imbalanced dataset through integrated resampling techniques and ML methods in the construction safety domain. A novel utilization plan was proposed and enhanced by the analysis results.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: artificial intelligence; construction safety; machine learning; occupational accidents; occupational health and safety; safety management
Index terms: Turkey, fatalities, construction industry, artificial intelligence, minority, sampling, occupational accident, strategy, construction site, quality of life, occupational health and safety, artificial neural network, construction firm, forest, safety management, construction safety, dataset, machine learning, decision-making, methodology, well-being, construction accident, practitioner
Subjects: research methods, public and environmental health, management, health risk and incident analysis, Geography, sociology, decision analysis, occupational health and safety management, data management, environmental health, industry analysis, organization, mental health and wellbeing, data collection methods, practitioner, modelling and simulation, work location, environmental science, artificial intelligence
Topics: Health and Safety, Business Strategy, Research Practice, Geographical Context, Risk Management, Roles and Professions, Sustainability, Digital Applications, Ethics, Site Management
Descriptive scope: 4 PCTE

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here