Reference section identification of construction specifications by a deep structured semantic model

Lee, G; Moon, S and Chi, S (2023) Reference section identification of construction specifications by a deep structured semantic model. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 30(9), pp. 4358-4386. ISSN 0969-9988

Abstract

Purpose: Contractors must check the provisions that may cause disputes in the specifications to manage project risks when bidding for a construction project. However, since the specification is mainly written regarding many national standards, determining which standard each section of the specification is derived from and whether the content is appropriate for the local site is a labor-intensive task. To develop an automatic reference section identification model that helps complete the specification review process in short bidding steps, the authors proposed a framework that integrates rules and machine learning algorithms. Design/methodology/approach: The study begins by collecting 7,795 sections from construction specifications and the national standards from different countries. Then, the collected sections were retrieved for similar section pairs with syntactic rules generated by the construction domain knowledge. Finally, to improve the reliability and expandability of the section paring, the authors built a deep structured semantic model that increases the cosine similarity between documents dealing with the same topic by learning human-labeled similarity information. Findings: The integrated model developed in this study showed 0.812, 0.898, and 0.923 levels of performance in NDCG@1, NDCG@5, and NDCG@10, respectively, confirming that the model can adequately select document candidates that require comparative analysis of clauses for practitioners. Originality/value: The results contribute to more efficient and objective identification of potential disputes within the specifications by automatically providing practitioners with the reference section most relevant to the analysis target section.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: construction specification; machine learning; natural language processing; project management; text mining
Index terms: mining, project management, integrated model, dispute, construction project, methodology, documents, practitioner, machine learning, bidding, specification, comparative analysis
Subjects: research methods, professional development, project management theory and practice, production management, contractual condition, geotechnical engineering, practitioner, dispute resolution, analytical methods, artificial intelligence, bidding, data analysis and analytics
Topics: Roles and Professions, Procurement, Engineering Principles, Information Management, Research Practice, Project Management, Contract Administration, Digital Applications, Legal Issues
Descriptive scope: 4 PCTA

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here