Liu, C; Cao, J; Duan, K and Wu, G (2023) Effect of network position on inter-team conflict and project success in megaprojects. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 30(10), pp. 4955-4977. ISSN 0969-9988
Abstract
Purpose: This study investigates the impact of network positions on inter-team conflicts and project success in megaprojects. Design/methodology/approach: Network position is measured with centrality and structural holes. Substantive conflict and affective conflict reflect inter-team conflicts. A questionnaire survey was implemented in Chinese megaprojects, and 309 valid questionnaires were collected. The data were analyzed using structural equation modeling and bootstrapping methods. Findings: The results show that centrality negatively impacts project success, while the presence of a team in a structural hole has no significant impact on project success. Centrality is negatively related to substantive conflict and is positively related to affective conflict. The team in a structural hole has a positive effect on substantive conflict and a negative effect on affective conflict. Substantive conflict and affective conflict have positive and negative effects on project success, respectively. The effect of network position on project success is mediated by inter-team conflict. Research limitations/implications: This research provides a reference for megaproject managers to better conduct network governance, manage inter-team conflict, and successfully manage projects. The study did not investigate the effects of changes in teams' network positions on project success. Future research should explore this facet of megaprojects. Originality/value: This research adds to existing research on network position, and reveals that project network governance is important for megaproject success. This provides a new direction for megaproject management. Furthermore, the results validate constructive and non-constructive roles and the mediating role of inter-team conflict. This complements the literature on conflict management, providing a reference for megaproject managers when managing inter-team conflict.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | inter-team conflict; megaproject; network position; project success |
| Index terms: | manager, conflict management, project network, structural equation modelling, survey, methodology, questionnaire, megaproject, project success, governance, presence |
| Subjects: | practitioner, business, data collection methods, strategic project management, environmental science, project planning, project management theory and practice, research methods, statistical analysis, conflict resolution |
| Topics: | Sustainability, Governance, Roles and Professions, Stakeholder Management, Research Practice, Project Management |
| Descriptive scope: | 5 PCTEA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here