Lu, H; Wang, H; Yu, D and Ye, J (2023) Sharp schedule compression in urgent emergency construction projects via activity crashing, substitution and overlapping: A case study of huoshengshan and leishenshan hospital projects in wuhan. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 30(8), pp. 3696-3712. ISSN 0969-9988
Abstract
Purpose: To meet the rapidly increasing demand for medical treatment during the outbreak of COVID-19, Huoshengshan and Leishenshan Hospital are rapidly built (9–12 days) in Wuhan. These two urgent emergency projects are unprecedented. In general, substantial literature suggests that the possibility of shortening a schedule by more than a quarter of its original duration is implausible. By contrast, the two projects had successfully compressed the schedules from months and years to about ten days. This study aims to investigate how this was done and provide references for future projects. Design/methodology/approach: The study uses qualitative case study techniques to analyze the project practices in two urgent emergency projects. Data were gathered through semi-structured interviews and archival research. During interviews, interviewees were asked to describe the project practices adopted to overcome the challenges and freely share their experiences and knowledge. Findings: The results illustrate that a high degree of schedule compression is achievable through tactful crashing, substitution and overlapping applications. The successful practices heavily rely on the high capacity of participants and necessary organization, management and technology innovations, such as three-level matrix organizational structure, reverse design method, site partition, mock-up room first strategies and prefabricated construction technology. For instance, the reverse design method is one of the most significant innovations to project simplification and accelerate and worthy of promotion for future emergency projects. Practical implications: The empirical findings are significant as they evoke new thinking and direction for addressing the main challenges of sharp schedule compression and provide valuable references for future emergency projects, including selecting high-capacity contractors and replacing the conventional design methods with reverse design. Originality/value: Substantial studies indicate that the maximum degree of schedule compression is highly unlikely to exceed 25%, but this study suggests that sharp compression is possible. Although with flaws in its beauty (i.e. compressing schedule at the expense of construction cost and quality), it is also a breakthrough. It provides the building block for future research in this fertile and unexplored area.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | COVID-19; crashing; overlapping; schedule compression; substitution; urgent emergency projects |
| Index terms: | methodology, construction project, schedule compression, COVID-19, interview, compression, organizational structure, crashing, strategy, technology innovation, duration, simplification, design method, construction technology, case study, archival research, promotion, outbreak, construction cost |
| Subjects: | financial and cost management, operations research, design methods, research design and methodology, digital engineering, data collection methods, sociology, project controls, material properties and characteristics, automation and robotics, production management, research methods, health risk and incident analysis, management |
| Topics: | Construction Materials, Project Management, Research Practice, Health and Safety, Business Strategy, Cost Management, Human Resources, Digital Applications, Design Practice, Organizational Design, Time Control |
| Descriptive scope: | 4 PCTE |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here