Moshtaghian, F and Noorzai, E (2023) Integration of risk management within the building information modeling (BIM) framework. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 30(5), pp. 1951-1977. ISSN 0969-9988
Abstract
Purpose: This research has been conducted with a view to creating a framework to integrate risk management based on building information modeling (BIM) information. Design/methodology/approach: In this research, all the information related to the construction of a residential project including 3D, 4D and 5D BIM models and the execution and control phases information was collected, and the risk list was determined for each activity accordingly. Findings: The present study has suggested a framework for risk management in order to optimize project changes. Originality/value: The lack of integration between 3D, 4D and 5D modeling besides execution information is a fundamental problem in many projects. The gap between these two groups of information will lead to improper management and late decisions, eventually imposing unforeseen delays and cost overruns. Risk management by the means of adopting a new approach has been addressed in recent studies using new methods, such as BIM and its associated technologies, some of which were mentioned in the review of theoretical literature in this research.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | building information modeling; integration; project management; risk management |
| Index terms: | risk management, project management, modelling, building information modelling, cost overrun, methodology, residential project, integration |
| Subjects: | organizational analysis, information systems, economic development, research methods, project management theory and practice, financial and cost management, analytical methods, risk assessment |
| Topics: | Risk Management, Cost Management, Engineering Principles, Research Practice, Project Management, Organizational Design, Digital Applications, Urban Studies |
| Descriptive scope: | 3 PCT |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here