How resilient safety culture correct unsafe behavior of new generation of construction workers: The mediating effects of job crafting and perceived work meaningfulness

Ni, G; Zhang, Q; Fang, Y; Zhang, Z; Qiao, Y; Wang, W and Deng, Y (2023) How resilient safety culture correct unsafe behavior of new generation of construction workers: The mediating effects of job crafting and perceived work meaningfulness. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 30(10), pp. 4821-4845. ISSN 0969-9988

Abstract

Purpose: The purpose of this paper is to explore the correction mechanism of resilient safety culture on new generation of construction workers (NGCWs)' unsafe behavior and test the multiple mediation effects of job crafting and perceived work meaningfulness based on the context of Chinese construction industry in order to find a new way to effectively correct the NGCWs' unsafe behavior. Design/methodology/approach: A theoretical model of correction mechanism was established based on literature research and theoretical deduction. An empirical study was employed based on confirmatory factor analysis and regression analysis with a sample of 404 NGCWs in China. Findings: The results indicated that resilient safety culture can effectively correct NGCWs' unsafe behavior through job crafting and perceived work meaningfulness. Job crafting and perceived work meaningfulness can play independent and serial mediating roles between resilient safety culture and unsafe behavior. Research limitations/implications: Research results only represent a short-term law about the correction mechanism of NGCWs' unsafe behavior based on a questionnaire study from China's construction industry. It is necessary to continue to implement a longitudinal study to test it in a relatively long period in future research. The findings also need to be verified based on the young construction workers in other countries. Practical implications: This study provides a theoretical basis and feasible management reference for construction enterprises in China to correct NGCWs' unsafe behavior from the perspective of resilient safety culture. Furthermore, the construction of resilient safety culture in construction enterprises can help NGCWs better carry out job crafting and perceive the meaning of work. Originality/value: This paper clarifies the correction mechanism of resilient safety culture on unsafe behavior of NGCWs, and further tests the independent mediating roles and a serial mediating role of job crafting and perceived work meaningfulness between resilient safety culture and unsafe behavior, which fills the research gap about the influence mechanism of resilient safety culture on young construction workers' unsafe behavior and enriches the theoretical system of unsafe behavior correction of construction workers.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: correction mechanism; job crafting; multiple mediation effect; new generation of construction workers; perceived work meaningfulness; resilient safety culture; unsafe behavior
Index terms: meaning, confirmatory factor analysis, unsafe behaviour, mediation, China, methodology, questionnaire, safety culture, construction worker, construction industry, regression analysis, empirical study
Subjects: practitioner, dispute resolution, data collection methods, financial risk, Geography, health safety and environment, research methods, statistical analysis, industry analysis, sociology
Topics: Legal Issues, Research Practice, Geographical Context, Health and Safety, Cost Management, Roles and Professions
Descriptive scope: 4 PCTA

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here