Ning, Y and Ling, F Y Y (2023) Selecting control strategies in projects of intangible outputs: Empirical evidence from architectural and engineering design projects. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 30(10), pp. 4695-4714. ISSN 0969-9988
Abstract
Purpose: Project managers rely on control strategies to deliver excellent outputs. However, little is known about how clients' project managers select control strategies in projects which are knowledge-intensive and have intangible outputs. This study aims to examine how clients' project managers select project control strategies in professional service projects. Design/methodology/approach: A questionnaire survey of 360 architectural and engineering (A/E) design projects was adopted. Data were analyzed through the hierarchical regression. Findings: Both clients' knowledge of measuring outcomes and process uncertainty give rise to their project managers setting up behavior and social controls. Level of process uncertainty positively moderates the impact of client's knowledge of measuring outcomes on outcome control. Research limitations/implications: This study mainly examined the client's knowledge of measuring outcomes and process uncertainties. Future studies could be conducted to expand the scope by including other contextual factors, for instance market and regulatory factors. Practical implications: From the client side, if they want to simultaneously adopt outcome, behavior and social controls, they would need to increase their knowledge of measuring outcomes by adopting established assessment tools or appointing a third party to assist in design outcome evaluation. Originality/value: This study contributes to the body of knowledge by showing that the level of intangibility of project outputs influences the types of control system which project managers adopt.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | control strategy; outcome measurability; process uncertainty; professional service projects; project managers |
| Index terms: | outcome control, body of knowledge, questionnaire, evidence, control system, professional service, methodology, social control, survey, strategy, project control, future study, engineering design, project manager |
| Subjects: | control systems, data collection methods, evaluation and assessment methods, profession, research design and methodology, organization, knowledge management, project delivery, monitoring and control, design process, management, research methods, social justice |
| Topics: | Business Strategy, Project Management, Research Practice, Information Management, Roles and Professions, Digital Applications, Ethics, Organizational Design |
| Descriptive scope: | 5 PCTEA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here